首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Anesthetic Management of Emergency Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke, Part 1: Patient Characteristics, Determinants of Effectiveness, and Effect of Blood Pressure on Outcome.
【24h】

Anesthetic Management of Emergency Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke, Part 1: Patient Characteristics, Determinants of Effectiveness, and Effect of Blood Pressure on Outcome.

机译:急性缺血性中风应急血管内血栓切除术的麻醉管理,第1部分:患者特征,有效性的决定因素,以及血压对结果的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the United States, stroke ranks fifth among all causes of death and is the leading cause of serious long-term disability. The 2018 American Heart Association stroke care guidelines consider endovascular thrombectomy to be the standard of care for patients who have acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation when arterial puncture can be made within 6 hours of symptom onset or within 6-24 hours of symptom onset when specific eligibility criteria are satisfied. The aim of this 2-part review is to provide practical perspective on the clinical literature regarding anesthesia care of patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy. Part 1 (this article) reviews the development of endovascular thrombectomy and the determinants of endovascular thrombectomy effectiveness irrespective of method of anesthesia. The first aim of part 1 is to explain why rapid workflow and maintenance of blood pressure are necessary to help support the ischemic brain until, as a result of endovascular thrombectomy, reperfusion is accomplished. The second aim of part 1, understanding the nonanesthesia factors determining endovascular thrombectomy effectiveness, is necessary to identify numerous biases present in observational reports regarding anesthesia for endovascular thrombectomy. With this background, in part 2 (the companion to this article), the observational literature is briefly summarized, largely to identify its weaknesses, but also to develop hypotheses derived from it that have been recently tested in 3 randomized clinical trials of sedation versus general anesthesia for endovascular thrombectomy. In part 2, these 3 trials are reviewed both from a functional outcomes perspective (meta-analysis) and a methodological perspective, providing specifics regarding anesthesia and hemodynamic management. Part 2 concludes with a pragmatic approach to anesthesia decision making (sedation versus general anesthesia) and acute phase anesthesia management of patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy.
机译:在美国,中风在所有死因中排名第五,是严重长期残疾的主要原因。 2018年美国心脏协会中风护理指南考虑血管内血液切除术,是当动脉穿刺在症状发作的6小时内或在症状发作后6-24小时内发生动脉穿刺时,对前循环中具有急性缺血性脑卒中的患者的护理标准。满足具体的资格标准。这一部门审查的目的是提供有关用血管内血管切除术治疗患者麻醉护理的临床文献的实践视角。第1部分(本文)回顾了血管内血栓切除术的发展和血管内血液切除术效果的决定因素,而无论麻醉方法如何。第1部分的第一个目的是解释为什么需要快速的工作流程和血压维持,以帮助支持缺血性脑,直到血管内血液切除术,完成再灌注。第1部分的第二个目的,了解确定血管内血液切除术效果的不安因子,是鉴定有关血管内血液切除术的麻醉报告中存在的许多偏差。在此背景下,在第2部分(本文的伴侣)中,简要概述了观察文献,主要是为了识别其缺点,而且还要发展衍生自最近在3次随机临床试验中进行的镇静临床试验的假设内血管血栓切除术的麻醉。在第2部分中,从功能结果视角(Meta分析)和方法的角度来看,这两项试验是从功能性结果的审查,提供有关麻醉和血液动力学管理的细节。第2部分结束了麻醉决策(镇静与全身麻醉)和血管内血管切除术治疗的患者的急性期麻麻醉管理的务实方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号