...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Closed-loop fluid administration compared to anesthesiologist management for hemodynamic optimization and resuscitation during surgery: An in vivo study
【24h】

Closed-loop fluid administration compared to anesthesiologist management for hemodynamic optimization and resuscitation during surgery: An in vivo study

机译:与麻醉师管理相比,与血流动力学优化和手术中复苏的麻醉师管理相比:体内研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Closed-loop systems have been designed to assist practitioners in maintaining stability of various physiologic variables in the clinical setting. In this context, we recently performed in silico testing of a novel closed-loop fluid management system that is designed for cardiac output and pulse pressure variation monitoring and optimization. The goal of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of this newly developed system in optimizing hemodynamic variables in an in vivo surgical setting. METHODS: Sixteen Yorkshire pigs underwent a 2-phase hemorrhage protocol and were resuscitated by either the Learning Intravenous Resuscitator closed-loop system or an anesthesiologist. Median hemodynamic values and variation of hemodynamics were compared between groups. RESULTS: Cardiac index (in liters per minute per square meter) and stroke volume index (in milliliters per square meter) were higher in the closed-loop group compared with the anesthesiologist group over the protocol (3.7 [3.4-4.1] vs 3.5 [3.2-3.9]; 95% Wald confidence interval, ?0.5 to ?0.23; P < 0.0005 and 40 [34-45] vs 36 [31-38]; 95% Wald confidence interval, ?5.9 to ?3.1; P < 0.0005, respectively). There was no significant difference in total fluid administration between the closed-loop and anesthesiologist groups (3685 [3230-4418] vs 3253 [2735-3926] mL; 95% confidence interval, ?1651 to 431; P = 0.28). Closed-loop group animals also had lower coefficients of variance of cardiac index and stroke volume index during the protocol (11% [10%-16%] vs 22% [18%-23%]; confidence interval, 0.8%-12.3%; P = 0.02 and 11% [8%-16%] vs 17% [13%-21%]; confidence interval, 0.2%-11.4%; P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: This in vivo study building on previous simulation work demonstrates that the closed-loop fluid management system used in this experiment can perform fluid resuscitation during mild and severe hemorrhages and is able to maintain high cardiac output and stroke volume while reducing hemodynamic variability.
机译:背景:闭环系统旨在帮助从业者在临床环境中保持各种生理变量的稳定性。在这种情况下,我们最近在硅测试的新型闭环流体管理系统中进行,该系统专为心输出和脉冲压力变化监测和优化而设计。本研究的目标是评估该新开发系统在体内外科手术环境中优化血流动力学变量的有效性。方法:十六次约克夏猪经历了2相出血方案,并通过学习静脉注射器闭环系统或麻醉师复苏。在组之间比较了中值血流动力值和血流动力学的变异。结果:心脏指数(在每平方米/分钟每分钟升)和行程体积指数(每平方米以毫升)相比,与协议的麻醉师组相比,闭环组更高(3.7 [3.4-4.1]与3.5 [ 3.2-3.9]; 95%沃尔德置信区间,?0.5至0.23; p <0.0005和40 [34-45] Vs 36 [31-38]; 95%沃尔德置信区间,?5.9至3.1; P <0.0005 , 分别)。闭环和麻醉学团之间的总流体施用没有显着差异(3685 [3230-4418] Vs 3253 [2735-3926] ml; 95%置信区间,α1651至431; p = 0.28)。闭环组动物在方案期间,心脏指数和中风体积指数的较低系数(11%[10%-16%] vs22%[18%-23%];置信区间,0.8%-12.3% ; p = 0.02和11%[8%-16%]与17%[13%-21%];置信区间,0.2%-11.4%; P = 0.04)。结论:在先前的仿真工作中的体内研究建立方面表明,该实验中使用的闭环流体管理系统可以在轻度和严重的出血期间进行流体复苏,并且能够在降低血液动力学变异的同时保持高的心输出和行程体积。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care University of California Irvine 101 S City;

    Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care University of California Irvine 101 S City;

    Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care University of California Irvine 101 S City;

    Surgery University of California Irvine Orange CA United States;

    Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care University of California Irvine 101 S City;

    Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care University of California Irvine 101 S City;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 麻醉学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号