...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of transplantation: official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons >Temporal changes in the composition of a large multicenter kidney exchange clearinghouse: Do the hard-to-match accumulate?
【24h】

Temporal changes in the composition of a large multicenter kidney exchange clearinghouse: Do the hard-to-match accumulate?

机译:大型多中心肾脏交换清算院组成的时间变化:难以匹配的积累吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

One criticism of kidney paired donation (KPD) is that easy-to-match candidates leave the registry quickly, thus concentrating the pool with hard-to-match sensitized and blood type O candidates. We studied candidate/donor pairs who registered with the National Kidney Registry (NKR), the largest US KPD clearinghouse, from January 2012-June 2016. There were no changes in age, gender, BMI, race, ABO blood type, or panel-reactive antibody (PRA) of newly registering candidates over time, with consistent registration of hard-to-match candidates (59% type O and 38% PRA = 97%). However, there was no accumulation of type O candidates over time, presumably due to increasing numbers of nondirected type O donors. Although there was an initial accumulation of candidates with PRA = 97% (from 33% of the pool in 2012% to 43% in 2014, P = .03), the proportion decreased to 17% by June 2016 (P .001). Some of this is explained by an increase in the proportion of candidates with PRA = 97% who underwent a deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) after the implementation of the Kidney Allocation System (KAS), from 8% of 2012 registrants to 17% of 2015 registrants (P = .02). In this large KPD clearinghouse, increasing participation of nondirected donors and the KAS have lessened the accumulation of hard-to-match candidates, but highly sensitized candidates remain hard-to-match.
机译:对肾脏配对捐赠的批判(KPD)是易于匹配的候选人迅速离开登记处,从而将池集中在难以匹配的敏化和血液类型候选者。我们研究了在2016年1月至2016年1月的美国最大的KPD清算所注册的候选人/捐助者对。2012年6月至2016年6月。年龄,性别,BMI,种族,ABO血型或小组没有变化随时间的新注册候选的反应抗体(PRA),具有一致的难以对候选者的登记(59%和38%PRA& = 97%)。然而,随着时间的推移没有候选候选类型的积累,可能是由于越来越多的o捐助者。虽然候选人初始积累了PRA> = 97%(从2012年的33%的池中的33%到2014年的43%,P = .03),比例在2016年6月下降至17%(P& .001)。其中一些是通过PRA&GT的候选者比例的增加来解释2015年注册人的%(p = .02)。在这家大型嘉育清算房中,越来越多的捐助者和KAS的参与量减少了难以匹配的候选人的积累,但高度敏感的候选人仍然难以达到。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号