...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Pharmaceutica Hungarica >Risk sharing methods in middle income countries [Kockázat-megosztási technikák alkalmazása a k?zepes j?vedelmucombining double acute accent országokban]
【24h】

Risk sharing methods in middle income countries [Kockázat-megosztási technikák alkalmazása a k?zepes j?vedelmucombining double acute accent országokban]

机译:中等收入国家的风险分担方法[风险分配技术在中等收入重音重音国家中的应用]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The pricing strategy of innovative medicines is based on the therapeutic value in the largest pharmaceutical markets. The cost-effectiveness of new medicines with value based ex-factory price is justifiable. Due to the international price referencing and parallel trade the ex-factory price corridor of new medicines has been narrowed in recent years. Middle income countries have less negotiation power to change the narrow drug pricing corridor, although their fair intention is to buy pharmaceuticals at lower price from their scarce public resources compared to higher income countries. Therefore the reimbursement of new medicines at prices of Western-European countries may not be justifiable in Central-Eastern European countries. Confidential pricing agreements (i.e. confidential price discounts, claw-back or rebate) in lower income countries of the European Union can alleviate this problem, as prices of new medicines can be adjusted to local purchasing power without influencing the published ex-factory price and so the accessibility of patients to these drugs in other countries. In order to control the drug budget payers tend to apply financial risk sharing agreements for new medicines in more and more countries to shift the consequences of potential overspending to pharmaceutical manufacturers. The major paradox of financial risk-sharing schemes is that increased mortality, poor persistence of patients, reduced access to healthcare providers, and no treatment reduce pharmaceutical spending. Consequently, payers have started to apply outcome based risk sharing agreements for new medicines recently to improve the quality of health care provision. Our paper aims to review and assess the published financial and outcome based risk sharing methods. Introduction of outcome based risk-sharing schemes can be a major advancement in the drug reimbursement strategy of payers in middle income countries. These schemes can help to reduce the medical uncertainty in coverage decisions for valuable innovative healthcare technologies. However risk-sharing schemes can also reduce the transparency of pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement, as the payback, and consequently the actual price per patient can be calculated only retrospectively. Therefore risk-sharing agreements can be interpreted as special forms of confidential pricing agreements to facilitate the implementation of differential pricing in middle income countries.
机译:创新药物的定价策略基于最大药品市场中的治疗价值。以价值出厂价为基础的新药的成本效益是合理的。由于国际价格参考和平行交易,近年来新药的出厂价格通道已经缩小。中等收入国家没有权力改变狭窄的药品定价渠道,尽管他们的公平意图是与高收入国家相比,从其稀缺的公共资源中以较低的价格购买药品。因此,在中东欧国家以西欧国家的价格报销新药可能是不合理的。欧盟较低收入国家的机密定价协议(即机密的价格折扣,回扣或返利)可以缓解此问题,因为可以将新药的价格调整为本地购买力,而不会影响已公布的出厂价等。患者在其他国家使用这些药物的机会。为了控制药品预算,付款人倾向于在越来越多的国家中对新药应用财务风险分担协议,以将潜在超支的后果转移给药品制造商。财务风险分担计划的主要矛盾在于,死亡率增加,患者坚持性较差,无法获得医疗保健提供者且没有任何治疗方法会减少药品支出。因此,付款人最近开始对新药应用基于结果的风险分担协议,以改善医疗保健的质量。本文旨在审查和评估已发布的基于财务和成果的风险分担方法。引入基于结果的风险分担计划可能是中等收入国家付款人的药物报销策略的重大进步。这些方案可以帮助减少宝贵的创新医疗技术在承保范围决策中的医疗不确定性。但是,风险分担计划还可以降低药品定价和报销的透明度,因为其投资回报率很高,因此每位患者的实际价格只能进行追溯计算。因此,风险共享协议可以解释为机密定价协议的特殊形式,以促进中等收入国家实施差异定价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号