首页> 外文期刊>American journal of therapeutics >A Network Meta-analysis of Outcomes of 7 Surgical Treatments for Distal Radius Fractures
【24h】

A Network Meta-analysis of Outcomes of 7 Surgical Treatments for Distal Radius Fractures

机译:用于远端半径裂缝的7例外科治疗结果的网络荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To determinate the optimal treatment for distal radius fractures (DRF) by comparing the pin-track infection (PTI) rates in patients treated with 7 surgical techniques [bridging external fixation (EF), nonbridging EF, K-wire fixation, plaster fixation, dorsal plating, dorsal and volar plating, and volar plating]. After an exhaustive search of electronic databases for relevant published studies, high-quality randomized controlled trails were selected for the present network meta-analysis based on predefined selection criteria. Statistical analyses of the extracted data were conducted using Stata 12.0 software. After careful selection, 19 randomized controlled trails were included in our network meta-analysis and contained a combined total of 1805 subjects who underwent various surgical procedures. The network meta-analysis results showed that compared with bridging EF for treating DRF, the nonbridging EF, plaster fixation, volar plating, and dorsal and volar plating showed statistically significant differences in PTI rates. Importantly, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve values of the surgical interventions revealed that the PTI rates of plaster fixation and of dorsal and volar plating were the lowest, suggesting that these 2 surgical techniques are optimal for DRFs treatment, compared with the other methods. Our results suggest that plaster fixation and dorsal and volar plating are the best surgical treatments for DRFs compared with 5 other most common techniques. Thus, plaster fixation and dorsal and volar plating emerge as the most effective and credible treatments in consideration of PTI rates.
机译:通过比较7例手术技术治疗的患者的销轨道感染(PTI)速率来确定远端半径裂缝(DRF)的最佳处理[桥接外固定(EF),非录音EF,K-Wire固定,膏药固定,背部电镀,背部和伏勒电镀,易镀层。在详尽的电子数据库搜索相关公开的研究之后,基于预定选择标准选择了高质量的随机控制路径,为目前的网络元分析。使用STATA 12.0软件进行提取数据的统计分析。在仔细选择之后,我们的网络Meta分析中包含19个随机控制的路径,并包含1805名受试者的合计总量,他们接受了各种外科手术。网络元分析结果表明,与治疗DRF的桥接EF相比,非录音EF,膏药固定,vlar电镀和背部和伏尔隆电镀显示出PTI率的统计学显着差异。重要的是,在外科干预的累积排名曲线值下的表面揭示了石膏固定和背部和伏尔隆电镀的PTI率是最低的,这表明这两种外科手术技术对于DRFS处理是最佳的,与其他方法相比。我们的结果表明,与5种最常见技术相比,膏药固定和背部和伏尔隆电镀是DRF的最佳手术治疗方法。因此,考虑到PTI率,膏药固定和背部和vlar电镀作为最有效和最可靠的治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号