首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Science >MESOZOIC-CENOZOIC GEOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE HIMALAYAN-TIBETAN OROGEN AND WORKING TECTONIC HYPOTHESES
【24h】

MESOZOIC-CENOZOIC GEOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE HIMALAYAN-TIBETAN OROGEN AND WORKING TECTONIC HYPOTHESES

机译:喜马拉雅 - 藏的中生代 - 新生代地质演变,玉簪属植物和工作构造假设

获取原文
           

摘要

The Himalayan-Tibetan orogen culminated during the Cenozoic India - Asia collision, but its geological framework and initial growth were fundamentally the result of multiple, previous ocean closure and intercontinental suturing events. As such, the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen provides an ideal laboratory to investigate geological signatures of the suturing process in general, and how the Earth's highest and largest orogenic feature formed in specific. This paper synthesizes the Triassic through Cenozoic geology of the central Himalayan-Tibetan orogen and presents our tectonic interpretations in a time series of schematic lithosphere-scale cross-sections and paleogeographic maps. We suggest that north-dipping subducting slabs beneath Asian continental terranes associated with closure of the Paleo-, Meso-, and Neo-Tethys oceans experienced phases of southward trench retreat prior to intercontinental suturing. These trench retreat events created ophiolites in forearc extensional settings and/or a backarc oceanic basins between rifted segments of upper-plate continental margin arcs. This process may have occurred at least three times along the southern Asian margin during northward subduction of Neo-Tethys oceanic lithosphere: from similar to 174 to 156 Ma; 132 to 120 Ma; and 90 to 70 Ma. At most other times, the Tibetan terranes underwent Cordilleran-style or collisional contractional deformation. Geological records indicate that most of northern and central Tibet (the Hoh-Xil and Qiangtang terranes, respectively) were uplifted above sea level by Jurassic time, and southern Tibet (the Lhasa terrane) north of its forearc region has been above sea level since similar to 100 Ma. Stratigraphic evidence indicates that the northern Himalayan margin of India collided with an Asian-affinity subduction complex - forearc - arc system beginning at similar to 60 Ma. Both the Himalaya (composed of Indian crust) and Tibet show continuous geological records of orogenesis since similar to 60 Ma. As no evidence exists in the rock record for a younger suture, the simplest interpretation of the geology is that India - Asia collision initiated at similar to 60 Ma. Plate circuit, paleomagnetic, and structural reconstructions, however, suggest that the southern margin of Asia was too far north of India to have collided with it at that time.
机译:喜马拉雅 - 藏人在新生代印度 - 亚洲碰撞期间高潮,但其地质框架和初始增长从根本上产生了多个,以前的海洋关闭和洲际缝线事件的结果。因此,喜马拉雅 - 藏族orogen提供理想的实验室,以研究缝合过程的地质签名,以及地球最高和最大的造山节特征。本文通过Himalayan-Tibetan Orogen的新生代地质综合了三叠纪,并在一系列示意性岩石圈规模横截面和古地理图中提出了我们的构造解释。我们建议在与古老,中间人和Neo-Thethys海洋关闭相关的亚洲大陆地区下的北浸介质板块在洲际缝线之前经历了南北沟渠的阶段。这些沟槽撤退事件在前臂扩展设置中创建了Ophiolites和/或上板大陆边缘弧的裂缝段之间的海洋盆地。在Neo-Thethys海洋岩石圈的向北俯冲期间,这一过程可能发生了至少三次南亚边缘:从类似于174到156 mA; 132到120 mA;和90到70 mA。最多的其他时候,藏族的泰国地区接受了科尔凯伦风格的或碰撞合约变形。地质记录表明,大多数北部和中部西藏(Hoh-Xil和Qi​​angtang Terranes)在侏罗纪时期抬高海平面,而西藏南部(拉萨特兰人)在其前臂地区的北部已经超过海平面以来海拔到100 mA。地层证据表明,印度喜马拉雅北部的裕度与亚洲亲和力俯冲复合体 - 前臂 - 弧形系统相遇,开始与60 mA类似。喜马拉雅(印度地壳组成)和西藏都显示出壁发生的连续地质记录,因为类似于60 mA。由于较年轻的缝合线的摇滚记录中没有证据表明,最简单的地质解释是印度 - 亚洲碰撞发起的类似于60 mA。然而,板路电路,古磁石和结构性重建认为,亚洲的南部边缘在印度北部太远,当时与它相撞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号