首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neurochirurgica >Non-assisted versus neuro-navigated and XperCT-guided external ventricular catheter placement: A comparative cadaver study
【24h】

Non-assisted versus neuro-navigated and XperCT-guided external ventricular catheter placement: A comparative cadaver study

机译:非辅助与神经导航和XperCT引导的外部心室导管放置:比较性尸体研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and purpose: Accurate placement of an external ventricular drain (EVD) for the treatment of hydrocephalus is of paramount importance for its functionality and in order to minimize morbidity and complications. The aim of this study was to compare two different drain insertion assistance tools with the traditional free-hand anatomical landmark method, and to measure efficacy, safety and precision. Methods: Ten cadaver heads were prepared by opening large bone windows centered on Kocher's points on both sides. Nineteen physicians, divided in two groups (trainees and board certified neurosurgeons) performed EVD insertions. The target for the ventricular drain tip was the ipsilateral foramen of Monro. Each participant inserted the external ventricular catheter in three different ways: 1) free-hand by anatomical landmarks, 2) neuronavigation-assisted (NN), and 3) XperCT-guided (XCT). The number of ventricular hits and dangerous trajectories; time to proceed; radiation exposure of patients and physicians; distance of the catheter tip to target and size of deviations projected in the orthogonal plans were measured and compared. Results: Insertion using XCT increased the probability of ventricular puncture from 69.2 to 90.2 % (p=0.02). Non-assisted placements were significantly less precise (catheter tip to target distance 14.3±7.4 mm versus 9.6±7.2 mm, p=0.0003). The insertion time to proceed increased from 3.04±2.06 min. to 7.3±3.6 min. (p<0.001). The X-ray exposure for XCT was 32.23 mSv, but could be reduced to 13.9 mSv if patients were initially imaged in the hybrid-operating suite. No supplementary radiation exposure is needed for NN if patients are imaged according to a navigation protocol initially. Conclusion: This ex vivo study demonstrates a significantly improved accuracy and safety using either NN or XCT-assisted methods. Therefore, efforts should be undertaken to implement these new technologies into daily clinical practice. However, the accuracy versus urgency of an EVD placement has to be balanced, as the image-guided insertion technique will implicate a longer preparation time due to a specific image acquisition and trajectory planning.
机译:背景与目的:正确放置脑室内引流管(EVD)来治疗脑积水对其功能至关重要,并最大程度地降低发病率和并发症。这项研究的目的是将两种不同的引流辅助工具与传统的徒手解剖界标方法进行比较,并测量疗效,安全性和准确性。方法:通过打开两侧以科赫尔点为中心的大骨窗,准备十个尸体头。分为两组(受训者和经过董事会认证的神经外科医师)的19位医生进行了EVD插入。心室引流尖端的目标是门罗的同侧孔。每个参与者都以三种不同方式插入外部心室导管:1)借助解剖学标志自由操作,2)神经导航辅助(NN)和3)XperCT引导(XCT)。心室撞击次数和危险轨迹;进行时间;患者和医生的辐射暴露;测量并比较了导管尖端到目标的距离以及在正交平面图中投影的偏差大小。结果:XCT插入使心室穿刺的可能性从69.2%增加到90.2%(p = 0.02)。非辅助放置的精度明显较低(导管尖端至目标的距离为14.3±7.4 mm对9.6±7.2 mm,p = 0.0003)。进行插入的时间从3.04±2.06分钟增加。至7.3±3.6分钟(p <0.001)。 XCT的X射线曝光量为32.23 mSv,但如果最初在混合手术室中对患者进行成像,则可以降低到13.9 mSv。如果最初根据导航协议对患者成像,则NN不需要额外的辐射暴露。结论:这项离体研究证明使用NN或XCT辅助方法可显着提高准确性和安全性。因此,应努力将这些新技术应用于日常临床实践。但是,由于特定的图像采集和轨迹规划,图像引导的插入技术将意味着更长的准备时间,因此必须权衡EVD放置的准确性和紧迫性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号