首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >Estimated albumin excretion rate versus urine albumin-creatinine ratio for the assessment of albuminuria: A diagnostic test study from the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease (PREVEND) study
【24h】

Estimated albumin excretion rate versus urine albumin-creatinine ratio for the assessment of albuminuria: A diagnostic test study from the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease (PREVEND) study

机译:估计白蛋白排泄速率与尿液白蛋白 - 肌酐比例用于评估白蛋白尿:预防肾和血管肠炎病的诊断试验研究(prevend)研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) in spot urine samples is recommended for albuminuria screening instead of measured albumin excretion rate (mAER) in 24-hour urine collections. In patients with extremes of muscle mass, differences in spot urine creatinine values may lead to under- or overestimation of mAER by ACR. We hypothesized that calculating estimated AER (eAER) using spot ACR and estimated creatinine excretion rate (eCER) may improve albuminuria assessment. Study Design Diagnostic test study. Setting & Participants 2,711 community-living individuals from the general population of the Netherlands participating in the PREVEND (Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease) Study. Index Test eAER was computed as the product of ACR and eCER. eCER was computed using 3 previously validated methods (Ix, Ellam, and Walser). Reference Test mAER, based on two 24-hour urine collections. Accuracy of the eAER and ACR were defined as the percentage of participants falling within 30% (P 30) of mAER. Results Mean age was 49 years, 46% were men, mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 84 ± 15 mL/min/1.73 m 2, and median mAER was 7.2 (IQR, 5.4-11.0) mg/d. Mean measured CER was 1,381 mg/d, and median ACR was 4.9 mg/g. Using the Ix equation, median eAER was 6.4 mg/d. In the full cohort, eAER was more accurate and less biased compared to ACR (P30, 48.9% vs 33.6%; bias, -34.2% vs -14.1%, respectively). In subgroup analysis, improvement was most notable in the middle and highest weight tertiles and in men. Using the other methods for eCER produced similar results. Limitations Little ethnic heterogeneity and a generally healthy cohort make extension of findings to other races and the chronically ill uncertain. Conclusions In a large community-dwelling cohort, eAER was more accurate than ACR in assessing albuminuria.
机译:背景技术尿液样品中的白蛋白 - 肌酐比例(ACR)被推荐用于白蛋白尿筛查,而不是24小时尿液收集中的测定白蛋白排泄率(MAER)。在肌肉质量极端的患者中,现场尿液肌酐值的差异可能导致ACR的MAER的低估或高估。我们假设使用斑点ACR和估计的肌酐排泄率(ECER)计算估计的AER(EAER)可以改善白蛋白尿评估。研究设计诊断测试研究。设置&参与者2,711名社区生活中的荷兰一般人口的个人参与预期(预防肾和血管肠道病)研究。索引测试EAER被计算为ACR和ECER的产品。使用3个以前验证的方法(IX,Ellam和Walser)计算ECER。参考测试MAER,基于两个24小时尿液收集。 EAER和ACR的准确性被定义为落在MAER的30%(P 30)范围内的参与者的百分比。结果平均年龄为49岁,46%是男性,平均估计肾小球过滤速率为84±15毫升/分钟/ 1.73米2,中位数MAER为7.2(IQR,5.4-11.0)Mg / D。平均测量CER为1,381mg / d,中位数ACR为4.9mg / g。使用IX方程,中位数为6.4 mg / d。在全面的队列中,与ACR相比,EAER更准确,偏差较少(48.9%与33.6%;偏见,分别为-34.2%Vs -14.1%)。在亚组分析中,改善在中间重量和最高的乳房和男性中最值得注意。使用其他ECer的方法产生了类似的结果。局限性少量的异质性和一般健康的队列使调查结果扩展到其他种族和慢性病的不确定。在大型社区住宅队列中,EAER在评估白蛋白尿中比ACR更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号