...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of physics >ROLLING AND SLIPPING DOWN GALILEOS INCLINED PLANE - RHYTHMS OF THE SPHERES
【24h】

ROLLING AND SLIPPING DOWN GALILEOS INCLINED PLANE - RHYTHMS OF THE SPHERES

机译:滚动和滑动伽利冬倾斜平面 - 球体的节奏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In ''Two New Sciences'' (TNS) Galileo presents a number of theorems and propositions for smooth solid spheres released from rest and rolling a distance d in time t down an incline of height H and length L. We collect and summarize his results in a single grand proportionality P: d(1)/d(2) = (t(1)(2)/t(2)(2))(H/L)(1)/(H/L)(2). (P) From what he writes in TNS it is clear that what we call P is assumed by Galileo to hold for all inclinations including vertical free fall with H/L = 1. But in TNS he describes only experiments with gentle inclinations H/L < 1/2. Indeed he cannot have performed the vertical free fall (H = L) experiment, because we (moderns) know that as we increase H/L, P starts to break down when H/L exceeds about 0.5, because the sphere, which rolls without slipping for small H/L, starts to slip, whence d starts to exceed the predictions of P, becoming too large by a factor of 7/5 for vertical free fall at H/L = 1. In 1973 Drake and in 1975 Drake and MacLachlan published their analysis of a previously unpublished experiment that Galileo performed that (without his realizing it) directly compared rolling without slipping to free fall. In the experiment, a sphere that has gained speed upsilon(1) while rolling down a gentle incline is deflected so as to be launched horizontally with speed upsilon 1 into a free fall orbit discovered by Galileo to be a parabola. The measured horizontal distance X(2) traveled in this parabolic orbit (for a given vertical distance fallen to the floor) was smaller than he expected, by a factor 0.84. But that is exactly what we (moderns) expect, since we know that Galileo did not appreciate the difference between rolling without slipping, and slipping on a frictionless surface. We therefore expect him to predict X(2) too large by a factor (7/5)(1/2) = 1/0.84. He must have been puzzled. Easy ''home experiments'' with simple apparatus available to Galileo (no frictionless air tracks, strobe lamps, or electronic rimers!) allow the student to use his/her musical ear (for rhythm and tempo) to study vertical free fall as well as balls rolling down steep or gentle inclines, with or without slipping, and perhaps appreciate Galileo's dilemma. (C) 1996 American Association of Physics Teachers. [References: 12]
机译:在“两个新的科学”(TNS)伽利略上呈现了许多定理和命题,用于休息释放的光滑固体球,并在时间t滚动距离H和长度L的倾斜度。我们收集并总结他的结果在单个大比例P:D(1)/ d(2)=(t(1)(2)/ t(2)(2))(H / L)(1)/(H / L)(2 )。 (p)从TNS中写的是,伽利略假设我们所谓的P是伽利略倾斜,包括垂直自由落体,其中H / L = 1.但在TNS中,他只描述了温和倾斜的实验H / L <1/2。事实上,他不能进行垂直自由落体(h = l)实验,因为我们(现代)知道当我们增加h / l时,当h / l超过约0.5时,p开始分解,因为球体没有Slipping for Small H / L,开始滑动,从而开始超出P的预测,变得过大,在H / L垂直落下的垂直自由落下的倍数为7/5倍。在1973年的德雷克和1975年的德雷克和Maclachlan公布了他们对先前未发表的实验的分析,即伽利略在没有滑倒的情况下直接比较滚动而不滑动到自由坠落。在实验中,在滚下柔和斜面的同时获得速度升高(1)的球体被偏转,以便水平地用速度Upsilon 1水平发射成伽利略发现的自由跌落轨道,以成为抛物线。在该抛物型轨道中行进的测量水平距离x(2)(对于倒在地板上的给定垂直距离)小于他预期的比例0.84。但这正是我们(现代)期望的,因为我们知道伽利略不欣赏滚动之间的差异而不滑倒,并且在无摩擦的表面上滑动。因此,我们希望他预测x(2)太大了一个因素(7/5)(1/2)= 1 / 0.84。他一定是疑惑的。简单的“家庭实验”用伽利略(无摩擦空气轨道,频闪灯或电子螺旋纱!)允许学生使用他/她的音乐耳朵(用于节奏和节奏)来研究垂直自由落体随着球滚下陡峭或柔和的倾斜,有或没有滑倒,也许据欣赏伽利略的困境。 (c)1996年美国物理教师协会。 [参考:12]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号