首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neurochirurgica >An approach to objective analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.
【24h】

An approach to objective analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

机译:利用相衬磁共振成像技术对脑脊液流动动力学进行客观分析的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The dopaminergic stabilizers pridopidine [4-(3-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1-propylpiperidine] and ordopidine [1-ethyl-4-(2-fluoro-3-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)piperidine] inhibit psychostimulant-induced hyperactivity, and stimulate behaviour in states of hypoactivity. While both compounds act as dopamine D2 receptor antagonists in vitro, albeit with low affinity, their specific state-dependent behavioural effect profile is not shared by D2 receptor antagonists in general. To further understand the neuropharmacological effects of pridopidine and ordopidine, and how they differ from other dopaminergic compounds in vivo, we assessed the expression of activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein/activity-regulated gene 3.1 (Arc),?an immediate early gene marker associated with synaptic activation, in the frontal cortex and striatum. Furthermore, monoamine neurochemistry and locomotor activity were assessed. The effects of pridopidine and ordopidine were compared to reference dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonists and antagonists, as well as the partial dopamine D2 agonist aripiprazole. Pridopidine and ordopidine induced significant increases in cortical Arc expression, reaching 2.2- and 1.7-fold levels relative to control, respectively. In contrast, none of the reference dopamine D1 and D2 compounds tested increased cortical Arc expression. In the striatum, significant increases in Arc expression were seen with both pridopidine and ordopidine as well as the dopamine D2 receptor antagonists, remoxipride and haloperidol. Interestingly, striatal Arc expression correlated strongly and positively with striatal 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, suggesting that antagonism of dopamine D2 receptors increases Arc expression in the striatum. In conclusion, the concurrent increase in cortical and striatal Arc expression induced by pridopidine and ordopidine appears unique for the dopaminergic stabilizers, as it was not shared by the reference compounds tested. The increase in cortical Arc expression is hypothesized to reflect enhanced N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor-mediated signalling in the frontal cortex, which could contribute to the state-dependent locomotor effects of pridopidine and ordopidine.
机译:多巴胺能稳定剂Pridopidine [4-(3-(甲基磺酰基)苯基)-1-丙基哌啶]和ordopidine [1-乙基-4-(2-氟-3-(甲基磺酰基)苯基]哌啶]抑制精神刺激药引起的过度活跃,并且在活动不足状态下刺激行为。尽管这两种化合物在体外均起多巴胺D2受体拮抗剂的作用,尽管亲和力很低,但它们特定的状态依赖性行为效应图通常不会被D2受体拮抗剂所共有。为了进一步了解普利多匹定和奥多匹定的神经药理作用,以及它们与体内其他多巴胺能化合物的区别,我们评估了活性调控的细胞骨架相关蛋白/活性调控的基因3.1(Arc)的表达,该基因是早期的早期基因标记与额叶皮层和纹状体中的突触激活有关。此外,评估了单胺神经化学和运动活性。比较了普利多匹定和奥多匹定与参考多巴胺D1和D2受体激动剂和拮抗剂以及部分多巴胺D2激动剂阿立哌唑的作用。普利多匹定和奥多匹定诱导皮质弧表达显着增加,相对于对照分别达到2.2倍和1.7倍。相反,参比多巴胺D1和D2化合物均未增加皮质Arc的表达。在纹状体中,普利多匹定和奥多匹定以及多巴胺D2受体拮抗剂,雷莫昔必利和氟哌啶醇均显着提高了Arc表达。有趣的是,纹状体Arc表达与纹状体3,4-二羟基苯基乙酸强烈而正相关,表明多巴胺D2受体的拮抗作用增加了纹状体中Arc的表达。总之,由多普达定和奥多普定引起的皮质和纹状体弧表达的同时增加对于多巴胺能稳定剂而言似乎是独特的,因为所测试的参考化合物没有共享这一点。假定皮质弧表达的增加反映了额叶皮层中N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体介导的信号转导增强,这可能有助于普利多匹定和奥多匹定的状态依赖性运动作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号