...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of dentistry >Bacterial microleakage of a bioactive pit & fissure sealant. An in vitro evaluation
【24h】

Bacterial microleakage of a bioactive pit & fissure sealant. An in vitro evaluation

机译:生物活性坑和裂缝密封剂的细菌微漏。 体外评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the sealing properties of three pit and fissure (P&F) sealants, Embrace Wet Bond (EWB), a bioactive P&F sealant Embrace Wet Bond through the addition of modified calcium phosphate (MCP) (EWBMCP) and ClinPro (CLPR). The sealing properties of the materials were tested by means of a bacterial microleakage test. Methods: 30 extracted intact human third molars were randomly assigned to three groups of 10 (n=10) teeth each. The teeth were cleaned with two passes of air abrasion, followed by rinsing for 20 seconds and then dried with compressed air for another 20 seconds leaving the enamel surface slightly moist. The coronal portion of each tooth was sectioned perpendicular to the long axis at the level of 4 mm below the top of the central fossa of the enamel. A parallel vertical channel 1 mm in diameter was prepared in the central fossa through the entire sample. All samples were sterilized with Gamma radiation. After etching the occlusal surface with 35% phosphoric acid gel followed by rinsing, the sealants were applied. The samples were stored at 37 degrees C in SPB for 3 weeks, thermal cycled for 2,000x (5-55 degrees C) and coated with nail varnish leaving 1 mm uncovered around the P&F material. Samples were then tested for microleakage of E. faecalis culture using a dual chamber leakage model. The broth in the lower chamber was checked daily for turbidity up to 90 days. Statistical significance was determined at P<0.05. Results: The median survival time for EWBMCP was significantly higher (P<0.05) than for EWB and CLPR. With respect to bacterial microleakage frequency, EWBMCP and CLPR behaved significantly better than EWB. The bioactive sealant EWBMCP outperformed the other two tested sealants in terms of resistance to bacterial microleakage. Long-term clinical studies are recommended to confirm these in vitro findings.
机译:目的:比较三个坑和裂缝(P&F)密封剂的密封性能,通过加入改性磷酸钙(MCP)和ClinPro(CLPR)来拥抱湿粘合的生物活性P&F密封剂。通过细菌微透盖测试测试材料的密封性能。方法:30提取完整的人第三磨牙,随机分配到三组10(n = 10)齿。用两个空气磨损清洁牙齿,然后漂洗20秒,然后用压缩空气干燥另外20秒,使搪瓷表面略微潮湿。每个牙齿的冠状部分在牙釉质的中心窝顶部下方4mm的水平处垂直于长轴切片。通过整个样品在中央窝中制备直径的平行垂直通道1mm。所有样品均用γ辐射灭菌。用35%磷酸凝胶蚀刻咬合表面后,漂洗,施加密封剂。将样品在37摄氏度的SPB中储存3周,热循环2,000x(5-55℃)并涂有钉子清漆,围绕P&F材料未覆盖1mm。然后使用双室泄漏模型测试样品的M.粪便培养的微渗透。每天检查下腔室中的肉汤,可达到90天的浊度。在P <0.05测定统计显着性。结果:EWBMCP的中位存活时间明显高于EWB和CLPR显着更高(P <0.05)。关于细菌微透视频率,EWBMCP和CLPR的表现明显优于EWB。生物活性密封剂EWBMCP在对细菌微透氧化物的抗性方面优于其他两个测试的密封剂。建议使用长期临床研究来确认这些体外发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号