...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials >Comparison of Toxicity and Treatment Outcomes in HIV-positive Versus HIV-negative Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal
【24h】

Comparison of Toxicity and Treatment Outcomes in HIV-positive Versus HIV-negative Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal

机译:静脉阳性抗肛周癌癌患者毒性和治疗结果比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose:To compare the toxicity and treatment outcomes in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive versus HIV-negative patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal who underwent definitive concurrent chemoradiation at a single institution.Materials and Methods:Fifty-three consecutive HIV-positive patients treated between 1987 and 2013 were compared with 205 consecutive HIV-negative patients treated between 2003 and 2013. All patients received radiotherapy at a single regional facility. The median radiation dose was 54 Gy (range, 28 to 60 Gy). Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of 2 cycles 5-FU with mitomycin-C given on day 1day 29). After treatment, patients were closely followed with imaging studies, clinical examinations, and rigid proctoscopies. Outcomes assessed were toxicity rates, progression-free survival, colostomy-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival.Results:Median follow-up was 34 months. Compared with HIV-negative patients, HIV-positive patients were younger (median age, 48 vs. 62 y) and predominantly male sex (98% of HIV-positive patients were male vs. 22% of HIV-negative patients). Of the HIV-positive patients, 37 (70%) were on highly active antiretroviral therapy, 26 (65%) had an undetectable viral load at the time of treatment, and 36 (72%) had a CD4 count>200 (mean CD4 count, 455). There were no significant differences in acute or late nonhematologic or hematologic toxicity rates between the 2 groups. At 3 years, there was no significant difference between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients in regards to progression-free survival (75% vs. 76%), colostomy-free survival (85% vs. 85%), or cancer-specific survival (79% vs. 88%, P=0.36), respectively. On univariate analysis, there was a trend toward worse overall survival in HIV-positive patients (72% vs. 84% at 3 y, P=0.06). For the entire cohort, on multivariate analysis only male sex and stage were predictive of worse survival outcomes. HIV status was not associated with worse outcomes in Cox models.Conclusions:In the highly active antiretroviral therapy era, HIV-positive patients with anal cancer treated with standard definitive chemoradiation have equivalent toxicity and cancer-specific survival compared with HIV-negative patients.
机译:目的:比较人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV) - 阳性与HIV阴性患者的毒性和治疗结果与肛管鳞状细胞癌,在单一机构接受明确的同时校长。材料和方法:连续五十三个艾滋病毒 - 与2003年至2013年间治疗的205例,在1987和2013年间治疗的阳性患者。所有患者均在一个区域设施接受放疗。中位辐射剂量为54倍(范围,28至60倍)。并发化疗由2天第29天给出的丝霉素-C组成2个循环5-FU)。治疗后,患者密切关注成像研究,临床检查和刚性的预剖视。评估的结果是毒性率,无进展的生存,无孢子细胞术存活,癌症特异性生存和整体存活率。结果:中位随访时间为34个月。与艾滋病毒阴性患者相比,艾滋病毒阳性患者患者较年轻(中位年龄,48例,62 y),主要是男性性别(98%的艾滋病毒阳性患者均为HIV阴性患者的患者)。在艾滋病毒阳性患者的情况下,37(70%)在高度活跃的抗逆转录病毒治疗中,在治疗时26例(65%)具有未检测到的病毒载荷,36(72%)具有CD4计数> 200(平均CD4计数,455)。 2组之间的急性或晚期的鼻咽病或血液学毒性率没有显着差异。在3年后,艾滋病毒阳性和HIV阴性患者在无进展生存期(75%vs.76%),无孢子术存活(85%vs.85%)或癌症 - 特异性存活(79%vs.88%,p = 0.36)。在单变量分析中,艾滋病毒阳性患者的整体生存率较差的趋势(在3 y,p = 0.06,72%vs.06)。对于整个群组,在多变量分析上,只有男性性和阶段的阶段预测更糟糕的生存结果。 HIV状态与COX模型中更差的结果无关。结论:在高度活跃的抗逆转录病毒治疗时代,用标准明确校长治疗的肛门癌患者具有相同的毒性和癌症特异性的存活率与HIV阴性患者相比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号