首页> 外文期刊>AIDS and behavior >New Measures for Research on Men Who Have Sex with Men and for At-Risk Heterosexuals: Tools to Study Links Between Structural Interventions or Large-Scale Social Change and HIV Risk Behaviors, Service Use, and Infection
【24h】

New Measures for Research on Men Who Have Sex with Men and for At-Risk Heterosexuals: Tools to Study Links Between Structural Interventions or Large-Scale Social Change and HIV Risk Behaviors, Service Use, and Infection

机译:与男性发生性交的男性和风险性异性恋的新措施:研究结构干预或大规模社会变化与艾滋病毒风险行为,服务使用和感染之间的工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Large-scale structural interventions and "Big Events" like revolutions, wars and major disasters can affect HIV transmission by changing the sizes of at-risk populations, making high-risk behaviors more or less likely, or changing contexts in which risk occurs. This paper describes new measures to investigate hypothesized pathways that could connect macro-social changes to subsequent HIV transmission. We developed a "menu" of novel scales and indexes on topics including norms about sex and drug injecting under different conditions, experiencing denial of dignity, agreement with cultural themes about what actions are needed for survival or resistance, solidarity and other issues. We interviewed 298 at-risk heterosexuals and 256 men who have sex with men in New York City about these measures and possible validators for them. Most measures showed evidence of criterion validity (absolute magnitude of Pearson's r >= 0.20) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha >= 0.70). These measures can be (cautiously) used to understand how macro-changes affect HIV and other risk. Many can also be used to understand risk contexts and dynamics in more normal situations. Additional efforts to improve and to replicate the validation of these measures should be conducted.
机译:大规模的结构干预和“大事”,如革命,战争和重大灾害可能会影响艾滋病毒传播,通过改变风险群体的大小,使高风险行为或多或少地改变风险发生的背景。本文介绍了研究可以将宏观社会变化与后续艾滋病毒传输联系起来的假设途径的新措施。我们开发了一个“菜单”的小说尺度和索引,包括关于不同条件下的性别和药物注射的规范,经历否认尊严,与文化主题的协议,关于生存或抵抗,团结等问题所需的行动。我们采访了298岁的异性恋性异性恋和256名男子,他们在纽约市与男子发生性关系,关于这些措施和可能的验证者。大多数措施都显示了标准有效性的证据(Pearson的绝对幅度= 0.20)和可靠性(Cronbach的alpha> = 0.70)。这些措施可以(谨慎)习惯于了解宏观变化如何影响艾滋病毒和其他风险。许多人也可以用于在更正常情况下了解风险上下文和动态。应进行额外的改进和复制这些措施的验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号