...
首页> 外文期刊>Alzheimer’s & dementia: the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association >Cost‐effectiveness of a collaborative dementia care management—Results of a cluster‐randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Cost‐effectiveness of a collaborative dementia care management—Results of a cluster‐randomized controlled trial

机译:合作痴呆护理管理的成本效益 - 簇随机对照试验结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to determine the cost‐effectiveness of collaborative dementia care management (DCM). Methods The cost‐effectiveness analysis was based on the data of 444 patients of a cluster‐randomized, controlled trial, conceptualized to evaluate a collaborative DCM that aimed to optimize treatment and care in dementia. Health‐care resource use, costs, quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost per QALY gained were measured over a 24‐month time horizon. Results DCM increased QALYs (+0.05) and decreased costs (?569€) due to a lower hospitalization and a delayed institutionalization (7 months) compared with usual care. The probability of DCM being cost‐effective was 88% at willingness‐to‐pay thresholds of 40,000€ per QALY gained and higher in patients living alone compared to those not living alone (96% vs. 26%). Discussion DCM is likely to be a cost‐effective strategy in treating dementia and thus beneficial for public health‐care payers and patients, especially for those living alone.
机译:摘要介绍本研究的目的是确定协作痴呆护理管理(DCM)的成本效益。方法采用成本效益分析是基于444名群体随机,受控试验的数据,概念化,以评估旨在优化痴呆症的治疗和护理的协作DCM。在24个月的时间范围内测量医疗保健资源使用,成本,质量调整的终身年度(QALYS)和每个QALY的增量成本。结果DCM增加了QALYS(+0.05)并降低成本(?569€)由于较低的住院治疗和延迟制度化(7个月)与通常的护理相比。 DCM成本效益的概率为88%,愿意支付的阈值为40,000欧元,并且仅与单独生活(96%与26%)相比,单独患者患者较高。讨论DCM可能是治疗痴呆症的成本效益的策略,从而有利于公共卫生应酬者和患者,特别是对于独自生活的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号