首页> 外文期刊>Alternative & complementary therapies: a new bimonthly publication for health care practitioners >Why Practitioners Should Care About Music Therapy: Understanding its Clinical Relevance and Practical Implications Through an Evidence-Based Study
【24h】

Why Practitioners Should Care About Music Therapy: Understanding its Clinical Relevance and Practical Implications Through an Evidence-Based Study

机译:为什么从业者应该关心音乐疗法:通过证据的研究理解其临床相关性和实际意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: With healthcare costs steadily rising, cost-effective alternatives to traditional medical approaches are needed. Specifically, music therapy (MT), a form of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), is shown to alleviate symptoms of an illness and improve overall well-being, as well as enhance allopathic treatment modalities, making it appropriate for use in various healthcare settings covered under many different payment schedules today. With interdisciplinary healthcare teams becoming the norm in practice, it is increasingly important that practitioners trained allopathi-cally understand the importance of CAM and certain types of CAM practices such as MT that can provide important benefits for patients. Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA), not only is wellness and well-being emphasized as part of overall healthcare goals, it is also reimbursable. Therefore, although some CAM practices such as MT require special licensure in order to serve clients specifically, any healthcare practitioner can understand and refer patients to MT services, as well as utilize aspects of MT within their own practice areas. Further, as the field of MT and appreciation for its benefits grows, evidence-based practice in MT is also essential. Therefore, research in CAM and MT furthers the overall acceptance over time by interdisciplinary teams, thereby increasing beneficial care approaches for patients. The purpose of this study was to identify and understand differences between physicians' (doctor of medicine [MD], doctor of osteopathic medicine [DO]) and non-physician practitioners' (nurse practitioners [NP], certified registered nurse anesthetists [CRNA], certified nurse rnidwives [CNM], physician assistants [PA], and clinical nurse specialists [CNS]) recommending practices, knowledge, and perspectives (attitudes, beliefs, and expectations) of MT as CAM. Clinically, understanding these differences is important to all practitioners so that they can better determine cost-effective means by which to enhance patient care within the confines of allopathic practice under the PPACA, Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance payment structures today. Materials and Methods: A quantitative methodology with a descriptive, exploratory, cross-sectional, and correlational research design was used to measure recommending practices, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and expectations of physicians and non-physician practitioners utilizing a principal investigator-created valid and reliable tool entitled the Global Complementary/Alternative and Music Therapy Assessment (GCAMTA). A sample of 237 physician and 307 non-physician (total N= 544) practitioners participated. Data were continually collected electronically during a six-month period using various social media platforms: Facebook, Twitter, and Linkedln. Additionally, access was provided to membership in several professional healthcare associations to recruit participants. Results: The GCAMTA revealed that 84.8% of physicians (MD/DO; 77 = 201/237) responded neutrally in their recommending practices, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and expectations toward MT as a CAM for their patients. Additionally, 86.6% of non-physician practitioners (NP, NA, CNM, CNS, PA; n = 266/307) responded more favorably toward MT as a CAM. For practitioners exhibiting higher knowledge of MT as a potential CAM (n = 207/307 [67.4%] non-physician practitioners vs. n = 36/237 [15.2%] MD/DO), favorability toward recommending MT as a CAM was also high. Results of the multivariate analysis of variance across all five dependent variables were statistically significant (p = 0.0001; a = 0.01). Conclusion: Educational curricula may contribute to the discrepancy in the views between physicians and non-physician practitioners. Traditional allopathic curricula may need to include teachings in holistic medicine in order to increase awareness of CAM such as MT.
机译:背景:需要稳步上升,需要稳步上升,经济高效的替代传统医疗方法。具体而言,音乐疗法(MT),一种互补和替代药物(CAM)的形式,被证明缓解疾病的症状并改善整体福祉,以及增强分子治疗方式,使其适合于各种医疗保健今天在许多不同的付款时间表下涵盖的设置。随着跨学科医疗保健团队在实践中成为规范,越来越重要的是,从业者训练有素地训练来自ampathi-cally,了解凸轮的重要性和某些类型的凸轮实践,如MT,可以为患者提供重要益处。根据2010年患者保护和实惠的护理法案(PPACA),不仅是健康和良好的强调,作为整体医疗保健目标的一部分,它也是可偿还的。因此,虽然诸如MT的一些凸轮实践需要特殊许可证,以便具体地为客户提供服务,但任何医疗保健从业者都可以理解和将患者推荐给MT服务,并在自己的实践领域中利用MT的方面。此外,随着MT的领域和对其益处的欣赏,MT中的证据实践也是必不可少的。因此,在互学科团队中,凸轮和MT的研究总体接受,从而增加了患者的有益护理方法。本研究的目的是识别和理解医生之间的差异(医学博士[MD],骨疗法医学博士[DO])和非医生从业者(护士从业者[NP],注册注册护士麻醉师[CRNA] ,经过认证的护士RNidwives [CNM],医师助理[PA],以及临床护士专家[CNS])推荐刚刚作为CAM的MT的实践,知识和观点(态度,信仰和期望)。在临床上,了解这些差异对所有从业者都很重要,以便他们可以更好地确定成本效益的手段,通过它可以在PPACA,Medicare,Medicatod和私人保险支付结构下提高患者护理。材料和方法:使用具有描述性,探索性,横截面和相关研究设计的定量方法来衡量医生和非医生从业者的推荐实践,知识,态度,信仰和利用主要调查员创造的有效性题为全球互补/替代和音乐治疗评估(GCAMTA)的可靠工具。 237名医生和307名非医生的样本(总N = 544)从业者参加。使用各种社交媒体平台的六个月期间,在六个月内通过电子方式收集数据:Facebook,Twitter和Linkedln。此外,在若干专业医疗保健协会中提供访问权限,以招聘参与者。结果:GCAMTA显示84.8%的医生(MD / DO; 77 = 201/237)在推荐的做法,知识,态度,信仰和对患者的凸轮中中性回应中性回应。此外,86.6%的非医生从业者(NP,Na,CNM,CNS,PA; N = 266/307)更有利地向MT作为凸轮响应。对于表现为潜在凸轮的MT更高知识的从业者(n = 207/307 [67.4%]非医生从业者与N = 36/237 [15.2%] MD / DO),对推荐MT作为凸轮的优势也是如此高的。所有五个依赖变量的多元差异分析的结果统计学意义(p = 0.0001; a = 0.01)。结论:教育课程可能有助于医师和非医生从业者之间的观点差异。传统的疗法课程可能需要在整体医学中包括教义,以提高MT等凸轮的认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号