首页> 外文期刊>AJOB empirical bioethics. >Morals or markets? Regulating assisted reproductive technologies as morality or economic policies in the states
【24h】

Morals or markets? Regulating assisted reproductive technologies as morality or economic policies in the states

机译:道德或市场? 将辅助生殖技术视为各州的道德或经济政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The availability of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) in the medical marketplace complicates our understanding of reproductive public policy in the United States. Political debates over ARTs often are based on fundamental moral principles of life, reproduction, and kinship, similar to other reproductive policies in the United States. However, ARTs are an important moneymaking private enterprise for the U.S. biotechnology industry. This project investigates how the U.S. states regulate these unique and challenging technologies as either moral policies or economic policies. Methods: This study employs ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to estimate the significance of morality and economic policy variables on ART policies at the state level, noting associations between state-level political, economic, and gender variables on restrictive and permissive state-level ART policies. Results: Economic variables (reflecting the biotechnology industry) and advocacy for access to ART on behalf of infertility patients increase the chances of states passing policies that enable consumer use of ARTs. Additionally, individual ART policies are distinct from one another in the ways that morality variables increase the chances of ART regulations. Surprisingly, the role of religious adherence among state residents varied in positive and negative relationships with individual policy passage. Conclusions: In general, these results support the hypothesis that ART laws are associated with economic as well as moral concerns of the states—ARTs lie at the intersection of issues of life and reproduction and of scientific innovation and health. What is most striking about these results is that they do not follow patterns seen in the legislation of abortion, contraception, and sexuality in general—those reproductive policies that are considered "morality policy." Similarly, economic variables are not consistently significant in the expected direction.
机译:背景:医疗市场中辅助生殖技术(艺术)的可用性使我们对美国生殖公共政策的理解使我们的理解变得复杂化。对艺术的政治辩论往往是基于生命,繁殖和血缘关系的基本道德原则,类似于美国的其他生殖政策。然而,艺术是美国生物技术行业的重要私人企业。该项目调查了美国各国如何规范这些独特而挑战性的技术作为道德政策或经济政策。方法:本研究采用普通的最小二乘(OLS)回归,以估计道德和经济政策变量对州立一级的艺术政策的重要性,注意国家级政治,经济和性别变量之间的协会对限制性和允许的国家级艺术政策。结果:经济变量(反映生物技术行业)和代表不孕症患者访问艺术的宣传增加了各国通过了能够消费消费艺术的政策的机会。此外,在道德变量增加艺术法规的途径方面,个人艺术政策彼此不同。令人惊讶的是,国家居民之间的宗教遵守在各个政策段落中的正面和负面关系中的作用。结论:一般来说,这些结果支持艺术法与经济以及国家艺术的道德问题有关的假设,位于生命和繁殖和科学创新与健康问题。这些结果最引人注目的是,他们不遵循堕胎,避孕和性行为的立法中看到的模式 - 那些被认为是“道德政策”的生殖政策。同样,经济变量在预期方向上并不始终重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号