首页> 外文期刊>AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology >Brain perfusion measurements using multidelay arterial spin-labeling are systematically biased by the number of delays
【24h】

Brain perfusion measurements using multidelay arterial spin-labeling are systematically biased by the number of delays

机译:使用多途星动脉旋转标签的脑灌注测量由延迟的数量系统地偏置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multidelay arterial spin-labeling is a promising emerging method in clinical practice. The effect of imaging parameters in multidelay arterial spin-labeling on estimated cerebral blood flow measurements remains unknown. We directly compared 3-delay versus 7-delay sequences, assessing the difference in the estimated transit time and blood flow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 87 cognitively healthy controls (78.7 3.8 years of age; 49 women). We assessed delay and transit time- uncorrected and transit time- corrected CBF maps. Data analysis included voxelwise permutation-based between-sequence comparisons of 3-delay versus 7-delay, within-sequence comparison of transit time- uncorrected versus transit time- corrected maps, and average CBF calculations in regions that have been shown to differ. RESULTS: The 7-delay sequence estimated a higher CBF value than the 3-delay for the transit time- uncorrected and transit time-corrected maps in regions corresponding to the watershed areas (transit time- uncorrected 27.62 12.23 versus 24.58 11.70 mL/min/ 100 g, Cohen's d 0.25; transit time- corrected 33.48 14.92 versus 30.16 14.32 mL/min/100 g, Cohen's d 0.23). In the peripheral regions of the brain, the estimated delay was found to be longer for the 3-delay sequence (1.52408 0.25236 seconds versus 1.47755 0.24242 seconds, Cohen's d 0.19), while the inverse was found in the center of the brain (1.39388 0.22056 seconds versus 1.42565 0.21872 seconds, Cohen's d 0.14). Moreover, 7-delay had lower hemispheric asymmetry. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the necessity of standardizing acquisition parameters in multidelay arterial spin-labeling and identifying basic parameters as a confounding factor in CBF quantification studies. Our findings conclude that multidelay arterial spin-labeling sequences with a high number of delays estimate higher CBF values than those with a lower number of delays.
机译:背景和目的:多利型动脉旋转标签是临床实践中有前途的新兴方法。在估计的脑血流量测量上的多簧动脉旋转标记中成像参数的影响仍然未知。我们直接比较3延迟与7延迟序列,评估估计的过境时间和血流的差异。材料和方法:本研究包括87个认知健康控制(78.7岁3岁; 49名女性)。我们评估了延迟和过境时间 - 未经校正和运输时间纠正了CBF地图。数据分析包括基于Voxelwise置换的序列比较3延迟与7延迟的序列比较,在传输时间 - 未校正的传输时间校正的映射的序列内比较,以及所示区域中的平均CBF计算差异。结果:7次延迟序列估计比在与流域区域对应的区域中的过渡时间的三延迟较高的CBF值,而不是流域区域的区域(运输时间 - 未校正27.62 12.23与24.58 11.70ml / min / 100克,Cohen的D 0.25;运输时间校正33.48 14.92与30.16 14.32ml / min / 100g,Cohen的D 0.23)。在大脑的外周区域中,发现估计的延迟对于3次延迟序列更长(1.52408 0.25236秒,与1.47755 0.24242秒,Cohen的D 0.19),同时在大脑中心发现(1.39388 0.22056秒与1.42565 0.21872秒,科恩的D 0.14)。此外,7次延迟具有较低的半球不对称。结论:本研究的结果支持多型动脉旋转标签中标准化采集参数的必要性,并将基本参数鉴定为CBF量化研究中的混淆因素。我们的研究结果得出结论,具有大量延迟延迟的多电动动脉旋转标记序列估计比具有较低延迟数量的CBF值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号