...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in therapy. >Modeled Health Economic Impact of a Hypothetical Certolizumab Pegol Risk-Sharing Scheme for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in Finland
【24h】

Modeled Health Economic Impact of a Hypothetical Certolizumab Pegol Risk-Sharing Scheme for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in Finland

机译:假设的Certolizumab Pegol共享方案对芬兰中度至重度类风湿性关节炎患者的假设癸醛PEGOL风险共享方案建模的健康经济影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Purpose To model the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of certolizumab pegol (CZP) (with and without a hypothetical risk-sharing scheme at treatment initiation for biologic-na?ve patients) versus the current mix of reimbursed biologics for treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Finland. Methods A probabilistic model with 12-week cycles and a societal approach was developed for the years 2015–2019, accounting for differences in ACR responses (meta-analysis), mortality, and persistence. The risk-sharing scheme included a treatment switch and refund of the costs associated with CZP acquisition if patients failed to achieve ACR20 response at week 12. For the current treatment mix, ACR20 at week 24 determined treatment continuation. Quality-adjusted life years were derived on the basis of the Health Utilities Index. Results In the Finnish target population, CZP treatment with a risk-sharing scheme led to a estimated annual net expenditure decrease ranging from 1.7% in 2015 to 5.6% in 2019 compared with the current treatment mix. Per patient over the 5?years, CZP risk sharing was estimated to decrease the time without ACR response by 5%-units, decrease work absenteeism by 24?days, and increase the time with ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses by 5%-, 6%-, and 1%-units, respectively, with a gain of 0.03 quality-adjusted life years. The modeled risk-sharing scheme showed reduced costs of €7866 per patient, with a?more than 95% probability of cost-effectiveness when compared with the current treatment mix. Conclusion The present analysis estimated that CZP, with or without the risk-sharing scheme, is a cost-effective alternative treatment for RA patients in Finland. The surplus provided by the CZP risk-sharing scheme could fund treatment for 6% more Finnish RA patients. Funding UCB Pharma.
机译:摘要目的是模拟美国风湿病学院(ACR)结果,成本效益和预算影响(CZP)的预算影响(与生物学-NA'VE患者的治疗发起,没有假设的风险分享方案)与目前滋养生物制剂的混合治疗芬兰中度至重度类风湿性关节炎(RA)。方法制定了12周周期和社会方法的概率模型于2015 - 2019年,占ACR反应(Meta-Analysis),死亡率和持久性的差异。如果患者在第12周未能达到ACR20响应,则会包括治疗开关并退还与CZP收购相关的成本,如果第12周未能实现ACR20响应。对于目前的治疗组合,第24周的ACR20确定的治疗延续。根据卫生公用事业指数获得质量调整的终身年。结果芬兰目标人口,具有风险共享计划的CZP处理导致估计的年度净支出减少从2015年的1.7%降低到2019年的5.6%,而目前的治疗组合则为5.6%。每位患者超过5?年,CZP风险共享估计减少了5% - 单笔加仑的时间,减少了24天的工作缺勤,并增加了ACR20,ACR50和ACR70响应的时间 - 分别为6% - 和1% - 单一,增益为0.03质量调整后的终身寿命。所建模的风险分享方案显示每位患者的7866欧元的成本降低,而且与当前治疗组合相比,超过95%的成本效益概率。结论本分析估计,有或没有风险共享方案的CZP是芬兰RA患者的成本效益的替代治疗。 CZP风险分享计划提供的盈余可以为6%的芬兰RA患者提供资金治疗。资助UCB Pharma。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号