首页> 外文期刊>Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems >The resignification process of Agroecology: Competing narratives from governments, civil society and intergovernmental organizations
【24h】

The resignification process of Agroecology: Competing narratives from governments, civil society and intergovernmental organizations

机译:农业生态的辞职进程:各国政府,民间社会和政府间组织的竞争叙事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The definition of Agroecology as a science, as a movement, and as a practice is widely accepted worldwide. But these three approaches are in fact interrelated elements which cannot be separated one from the others. They rather articulate among them to reflect different mental models and narratives all willing to tackle the unsustainability of food systems. However, this fragmentation, together with the late development of policy proposals to promote agroecology at higher scales (political agroecology), has facilitated the emergence of different narratives in the political area, in a process of resignification of what is agroecology. Through a lexicometric analysis of policy documents from different political actors (civil society, governments, and intergovernmental organizations) which self-claim to promote agroecology, I identify five narratives in the political arena, which put different emphasis on the different dimensions of agroecology and on different scales (from farm to the food system).
机译:农业生态学作为科学的定义,作为运动,作为一种练习在全球范围内得到广泛接受。但这三种方法实际上是不关联的元素,这些元素不能与其他人分开。他们宁愿阐明他们中间,以反映不同的心理模型和叙述愿意解决食品系统的不可持续性。然而,这种破碎化与政策建议在更高尺度(政治生物学)中促进农业生态的延迟发展,促进了政治领域不同叙述的出现,在辞除了农业生态的过程中。通过对不同政治行动者(民间社会,政府和政府间组织的政策文件的词汇表分析,所述自我索赔来促进农业生态学,我在政治舞台上识别五个叙事,这对农业学和农业学的不同方面进行了不同的重点不同的鳞片(从农场到食品系统)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号