【24h】

Improving ground cover and landscape function in a semi-arid rangeland through alternative grazing management

机译:通过替代放牧管理改善半干旱牧场地面覆盖和景观功能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The development and adoption of sustainable grazing strategies is important to improve the functionality and productivity of agricultural landscapes. Alternative grazing systems incorporating periods of planned rest may achieve this compared to continuous grazing systems, but the evidence is conflicting. Using paired paddock contrasts, soil characteristics, ground cover and landscape function (i.e. soil stability, nutrient cycling, infiltration and landscape organisation indices) were compared between alternative grazing management (incorporating periods of rest), traditional (continuous) grazing, and areas managed for conservation (ungrazed by commercial livestock but grazed by native and feral herbivores) on contrasting soil types in semi-arid rangelands. Relationships between the response variables and understorey floristic biodiversity measures were also explored. Total ground cover was greater under conservation management than grazing, and was greater under alternative grazing than traditional grazing management. Indices of landscape function, including stability, nutrient cycling, patch area and landscape organisation were significantly greater, and interpatch length significantly shorter, under conservation compared to traditional grazing management. Alternative grazing management had intermediate values of landscape function which did not differ significantly to traditional grazing or conservation treatments. Ground cover and floristic biodiversity measures were often positively correlated, but there was no clear relationship between most landscape function and plant biodiversity indices. Landscape function may be important in detecting changes in rangelands that remain undetected by floristic diversity measures. Alternative grazing strategies incorporating planned rest have the potential to improve ground cover with the associated benefits of improved productivity and landscape function compared to continuous grazing regimes.
机译:可持续放牧战略的发展和采用对于提高农业景观的功能和生产力是重要的。与连续放牧系统相比,合并计划休息时段的替代放牧系统可以实现这一目标,但证据是矛盾的。在替代放牧管理(剩下的休息期),传统(连续)放牧和管理区域之间,使用成对围场对比度,土壤特性,地面覆盖和景观功能(即土壤稳定性,营养循环,渗透和景观组织指数)保护(由商业牲畜储存,但由本土和野生食草动物放牧)关于半干旱牧场的土壤类型对比土壤类型。还探讨了响应变量与下层植物生物多样性措施之间的关系。在保护管理中,覆盖物的总覆盖率比放牧更大,并且在替代地放牧的情况下比传统的放牧管理更大。与传统放牧管理相比,横向函数的横向函数,包括稳定性,营养循环,贴片区域和景观组织显着较短,互补长度明显缩短。替代放牧管理层具有景观功能的中间价值,这对传统的放牧或保护治疗没有大幅不同。地面封面和植物生物多样性措施往往是正相关的,但大多数景观功能与植物生物多样性指数没有明确的关系。景观功能在检测牧场的变化方面可能很重要,这些植物的多元化措施仍然未被发现。与持续放牧制度相比,加入计划休息的替代放牧策略具有改善生产率和景观功能的相关益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号