首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural and Forest Meteorology >Comparison of energy partitioning between artificial pasture and degraded meadow in three-river source region on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: A case study
【24h】

Comparison of energy partitioning between artificial pasture and degraded meadow in three-river source region on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: A case study

机译:青藏高原三河源区中人工牧场与退化草甸能源分区的比较 - 以案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To reveal the differences in energy exchange between a degraded alpine meadow (DM) and an artificial pasture (AP, that was artificially planted with Elymus nutans on the ploughed degraded meadow), the energy partitioning and its biophysical controls were compared between the two study sites in the Three-River Source Region (TRSR) on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The mean maximum leaf area index (LAI) for AP and DM was 2.66 and 1.08 m(2) m(-2), respectively. The net radiation (R-n) sensible heat flux (H) latent heat flux (lambda E), and soil heat flux (G) showed similar seasonal changes for the two study sites; no obvious differences in energy partitioning were noted between AP and DM during the non-growing season. However, during the growing season, R-n of DM was about 5.4% higher than that of AP, although almost the same downward shortwave and longwave radiation was received at both sites. Moreover, the mean albedo (alpha) of DM was lower by 0.02 than that of AP, and the mean soil surface temperature of DM was 4.1 degrees C lower than that of AP. The partitioning of available energy into H and lambda E of DM differed markedly from those of AP, and the lambda E/R-n ratio of DM was 16.4% higher than that of AP, whereas the H/R-n ratio of the former was 20.9% lower than that of the latter during the growing season. The growing season (annual) mean Bowen ratio (beta) was 0.69 +/- 0.04 and 0.90 +/- 0.03 (2.38 +/- 0.09 and 2.93 +/- 0.12) at DM and AP, respectively, indicating that more available energy of DM was used for lambda E in comparison with that for AP. The difference in vegetation was considered to be the major factor leading to differences in the energy partitioning between the two sites. The results of the case study suggest that meadow degradation increases water loss through evapotranspiration and that enlarging the area of artificial pasture can increase the plant productivity and improve the water conservation capacity in this region.
机译:揭示在犁过的降解草地上用Elymus Nutans人工饲养的人工牧场(AP的人工牧场(AP)之间的能量交换差异,比较了两项研究网站之间的能量分配及其生物物理对照在青藏高原的三河源区(TRSR)。 AP和DM的平均最大叶面积指数(LAI)分别为2.66和1.08米(2)m(-2)。净辐射(R-N)明智的热通量(H)潜热通量(Lambda e)和土壤热通量(G)显示了两种研究部位的类似季节性变化;在非生长季节期间,在AP和DM之间没有明显差异。然而,在生长季节期间,DM的R-N高于AP的R-N大约是AP的5.4%,尽管在这两个地点都接受了几乎相同的向下短波和龙波辐射。此外,DM的平均玻璃玻璃(α)较低0.02的AP,DM的平均土壤表面温度低于AP的4.1℃。从AP的那些,DM的H和Lambda e的可用能量分别与AP的λ均显着不同,并且DM的λE/ rN比率高于AP的16.4%,而前者的H / RN比例降低了20.9%比在生长季节的后者。生长季节(年)平均弓形比(β)分别为DM和AP的0.69 +/- 0.04和0.90 +/- 0.03(2.38 +/- 0.09和2.93 +/- 0.12),表明更具可用的能量与AP相比,DM用于LABDA E。植被的差异被认为是导致两个地点之间能量分区差异的主要因素。案例研究结果表明,草地性降解通过蒸散量增加了水分,并扩大了人工牧场面积可以提高植物生产率,提高该地区的水资源容量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号