...
首页> 外文期刊>Aerosol Science and Technology: The Journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research >Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP)
【24h】

Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP)

机译:湿度,密度和入口吸气效率校正提高了西北西北突(NW-IGP)郊区校准期间低成本传感器的精度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Low-cost particulate matter (PM) sensors are now widely used by concerned citizens to monitor PM exposure despite poor validation under field conditions. Here, we report the field calibration of a modified version of the Laser Egg (LE), against Class III US EPA Federal Equivalent Method PM10 and PM2.5 beta-attenuation analyzers. The calibration was performed at a site in the north-western Indo-Gangetic Plain from 27 April 2016 to 25 July 2016. At ambient PM mass loadings ranging from <1-838 mu g m(-3) and <1-228 mu g m(-3) for PM10 and PM2.5, respectively, measurements of PM10, PM2.5 from the LE were precise, with a Pearson correlation coefficient (r) >0.9 and a percentage coefficient of variance (CV) <12%. The original Mean Bias Error (MBE) of similar to-90 mu g m(-3) decreased to -30.9 mu g m(-3) (Sensor 1) and -23.2 mu g m(-3) (Sensor 2) during the summer period (27 April-15 June 2016) after correcting for particle density and aspiration losses. During the monsoon period (16 June-25 July 2016) the MBE of the PM2.5 measurements decreased from 19.1 mu g m(-3) to 8.7 mu g m(-3) and from 28.3 mu g m(-3) to 16.5 mu g m(-3) for Sensor 1 and Sensor 2, respectively, after correcting for particle density and hygroscopic growth. The corrections reduced the overall MBE to <20 mu g m(-3) for PM10 and <3 mu g m(-3) for PM2.5, indicating that modified version of the LE could be used for ambient PM monitoring with appropriate correction and meteorological observations. However, users of the original product may underestimate their PM10 exposure. Copyright (c) 2020 American Association for Aerosol Research
机译:尽管在现场条件下验证差,但仍然受到涉及公民的低成本颗粒物质(PM)传感器现在广泛使用。在这里,我们报告了激光蛋(Le)的改进版本的现场校准,针对III类US EPA联邦等效方法PM10和PM2.5β-衰减分析仪。从2016年4月27日至2016年7月25日,在西北西北地区的南北难道平原网站上进行了校准。在环境PM大众载荷范围内(-3)(3)和<1-228 mm gm( -3)对于PM10和PM2.5,分别测量PM10,PM2.5来自LE的PM2.5精确,Pearson相关系数(R)> 0.9和百分比变异系数(CV)<12%。在夏季期间,类似于-90μmG(-3)的原始平均偏置误差(-3)的偏差误差(-3)(-3)降低至-30.9μg(-3)(传感器1)和-23.2μg(-3)(传感器2) (2016年4月27日 - 纠正粒子密度和抽吸损失后。在季风期间(2016年7月16日16日),PM2.5的MBE测量从19.1亩(-3)到8.7 mm gm(-3)和28.3 mm gm(-3)到16.5 mm gm (-3)对于传感器1和传感器2,分别在校正颗粒密度和吸湿生长后。对PM2.5的PM10和<3μg(-3)的整体MBE将整体MBE降低到<20 mg(-3),表明LE的修改版本可以用于适当的校正和气象的环境下午监测观察。然而,原始产品的用户可能低估PM10暴露。版权所有(c)2020美国气溶胶研究协会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号