...
首页> 外文期刊>Addiction >Effectiveness of intensive practice nurse counselling versus brief general practitioner advice, both combined with varenicline, for smoking cessation: a randomized pragmatic trial in primary care
【24h】

Effectiveness of intensive practice nurse counselling versus brief general practitioner advice, both combined with varenicline, for smoking cessation: a randomized pragmatic trial in primary care

机译:密集实践护士咨询与简短的一般从业者建议的有效性,既与瓦宁线相结合,吸烟:初级保健中的随机务实试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Aims To study the effectiveness of intensive counselling by a practice nurse (PN) versus brief advice by a general practitioner (GP), each combined with pharmacotherapy, for 6?months’ tobacco abstinence (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included 12‐month abstinence, medication adherence and incremental costs per life‐year gained. Design A multi‐site ( n ?=?10), two‐group, parallel, pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Setting A network of primary health‐care centres in the Netherlands. Participants A total of 295 adult daily smokers (mean age?=?48?years; mean cigarettes/day?=?19). Intervention and comparator Patients were randomized to receive individual counselling by a practice nurse (PN) ( n ?=?149) or brief advice by a general practitioner (GP) (146). All patients received 12?weeks of open‐label varenicline. Measurements The primary outcome was prolonged biochemically validated abstinence from weeks 9 to 26 after treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included abstinence from weeks 9 to 52, good dosing adherence (?80%?days taken) and incremental costs per life‐year gained. Findings Abstinence rates in the PN versus GP groups were 32.2% ( n ?=?48) versus 39.0% [ n ?=?57; odds ratio (OR)?=?0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI)?=?0.44–1.16] from weeks 9 to 26 and 25.5% ( n ?=?38) versus 28.8% ( n ?=?42; OR?=?0.84, 95% CI?=?0.50–1.43) from weeks 9 to 52, respectively. Values of the Bayes factor indicated that the PN and GP were equally effective. Good dosing adherence was significantly lower in the PN (45.5%, n ?=?56/123) than in the GP group (62.0%, n ?=?75/121; OR?=?0.45, 95% CI?=?0.26–0.77), and the incremental costs per life‐year gained were –?416.10. Conclusions Among people seeking help to stop smoking from their general practice, one‐off brief advice from a general practitioner appears to be as effective as several sessions of behavioural support from a practice nurse when smoking cessation medication is provided.
机译:摘要旨在研究练习护士(PN)的强化咨询的有效性与一般从业者(GP)的简短建议,每次与药物治疗相结合,为6?几个月的烟草禁欲(主要结果)。次要结果包括每年生命年份的12个月禁欲,药物申请和增量成本。设计一个多站点(n?=?10),双组,并行,务实的随机对照试验。在荷兰设定初级保健中心网络。参与者共295名成年人每日吸烟者(平均年龄?=?48?年;均值香烟/日?=?19)。干预和比较患者随机地接受练习护士(PN)(N?= 149)或一般从业者(GP)的简要建议(146)的个人咨询。所有患者均接受12个?几周的开放标签瓦尼尼线。测量在治疗开始后,从数周9至26周延长生物化学验证的禁因。二次结果包括从第9周到52周的禁欲,良好的给药粘附(&?80%?拍摄),每个救死年度的增量成本。研究结果对GP组的禁欲率为32.2%(n?=Δ48),而39.0%[n吗?=?57;赔率比(或)?=?0.71; 95%置信区间(CI)?= 0.44-1.16]从数周9到26和25.5%(n?=Δ38)与28.8%(n?=Δ22;或?= 0.84,95%ci?= 0.50-1.43分别从数周9到52。贝叶因子的值表明PN和GP同样有效。 Pn的良好给药粘附性显着低于GP组(45.5%,N?= 56/123)(62.0%,n?= 75/121;或?= 0.45,95%ci?=? 0.26-0.77),并获得每年获得的增量成本 - ?416.10。结论在寻求帮助吸烟的人们中,一般从业者的一次性简短建议似乎与练习护士提供了禁止吸烟药物时的行为支持的几次会议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号