...
首页> 外文期刊>Addiction >Documented brief intervention associated with reduced linkage to specialty addictions treatment in a national sample of VA patients with unhealthy alcohol use with and without alcohol use disorders
【24h】

Documented brief intervention associated with reduced linkage to specialty addictions treatment in a national sample of VA patients with unhealthy alcohol use with and without alcohol use disorders

机译:记录的简要干预与特种成瘾治疗的联系有关,在VA患者的国家样本中,不健康的酒精使用和无酒精使用障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background and aims Alcohol screening, brief intervention (BI) and referral to treatment is often considered stepped care, such that BI with referral links patients to treatment. A meta‐analysis of randomized trials found no evidence that BI increases treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD). This study aimed to determine whether BI is associated with receipt of treatment for AUD among patients receiving BI as part of routine care. Design Regression analysis. Setting US Veterans Health Administration (VA), in which BI is supported by performance measurement and electronic clinical reminders. Participants VA outpatients with positive Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption screens (≥?5) ( n ?=?830,825) documented nationally from 1 October 2009 to 30 May 2013. Measurements Regression models estimated the prevalence of receiving VA specialty addictions treatment within 0–365?days for patients with documented BI (advice to reduce/abstain within 0–14?days) compared to those without. Models clustered on patient and adjusted for demographics and mental health and substance use conditions were fit among all patients and stratified across documented past‐year AUD diagnosis. Multiple secondary analyses assessed robustness of findings, including assessing repeated BI as a predictor. Findings Among 830,825 VA outpatients with unhealthy alcohol use (1,172,606 positive screens), documented BI was associated with lower likelihood of receiving VA specialty addictions treatment [adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR)?=?0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI)?=?0.83–0.84]. Associations were similar for those with and without AUD (aIRR?=?0.83, 95% CI?=?0.82–0.84 and aIRR?=?0.86, 95% CI?=?0.83–0.88, respectively) and in most secondary analyses. However, among patients without AUD, documentation of more than one BI was associated with greater likelihood of treatment relative to no BI (aIRR?=?1.75, 95% CI?=?1.68–1.83). Conclusions In a national sample of US Veterans Health Administration patients with unhealthy alcohol use, documented brief intervention for alcohol use was associated with lower likelihood of receiving specialty addictions treatment regardless of alcohol use disorder diagnosis.
机译:摘要背景和AIMS酒精筛选,简要干预(BI)和转诊经常被认为是继承的护理,使BI具有转诊与患者治疗。对随机试验的荟萃分析没有证据表明,BI增加了酒精使用障碍的治疗(AUD)。本研究旨在确定BI是否与接收到患者患者的治疗相关的患者作为常规护理的一部分。设计回归分析。设置美国退伍军人健康管理(VA),其中BI是通过性能测量和电子临床提醒支持的。参与者VA外分泌患者用阳性酒精使用障碍识别测试消耗屏幕(≥?5)(n?= 1030,825),从2009年10月1日至2013年5月30日文件记录。测量回归模型估计在0-中接受VA特殊成瘾治疗的患病率365岁的患者有关记录的BI(建议在0-14内减少/弃权的建议)的天数与那些没有。在患者身上聚集并调整人口统计和心理健康和物质使用条件的型号适合所有患者,并在记录的过去年度AUD诊断中分层。多次二次分析评估了调查结果的稳健性,包括评估重复的BI作为预测因子。 830,825 VA门诊患者在不健康的酒精使用(1,172,606个阳性屏幕)中,记录的BI与接受VA特殊成瘾治疗的较低可能性有关[调整后发病率比(AIRR)吗?= 0.84,95%置信区间(CI)?= ?0.83-0.84]。有关的关联与AUD(AIRR?= 0.83,95%CI?=?0.82-0.84和AIRR?= 0.86,95%CI?=?0.83-0.88分别)和大多数二次分析。然而,在没有诊所的患者中,多于一个BI的文件与相对于NO BI(AIRR?= 1.75,95%CI?=?1.68-1.83)相关的患者。结论在美国退伍军人卫生管理患者的国家样本中不健康的酒精使用,记录了含酒精的简短干预与接受特种成瘾治疗的可能性较低,无论酒精使用障碍诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号