...
首页> 外文期刊>Addiction >Concordance between the diagnostic guidelines for alcohol and cannabis use disorders in the draft ICD-11 and other classification systems: analysis of data from the WHO's World Mental Health Surveys
【24h】

Concordance between the diagnostic guidelines for alcohol and cannabis use disorders in the draft ICD-11 and other classification systems: analysis of data from the WHO's World Mental Health Surveys

机译:ICD-11草案和其他分类系统中的酒精和大麻使用障碍诊断指南之间的一致性:从世界卫生组织的世界心理健康调查中分析数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and aims The World Health Organization's (WHO's) proposed International Classification of Diseases, 11th edition (ICD-11) includes several major revisions to substance use disorder (SUD) diagnoses. It is essential to ensure the consistency of within-subject diagnostic findings throughout countries, languages and cultures. To date, agreement analyses between different SUD diagnostic systems have largely been based in high-income countries and clinical samples rather than general population samples. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of, and concordance between diagnoses using the ICD-11, The WHO's ICD 10th edition (ICD-10) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th and 5th editions (DSM-IV, DSM-5); the prevalence of disaggregated ICD-10 and ICD-11 symptoms; and variation in clinical features across diagnostic groups. Design Cross-sectional household surveys. Setting Representative surveys of the general population in 10 countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Iraq, Northern Ireland, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Spain) of the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Participants Questions about SUDs were asked of 12 182 regular alcohol users and 1788 cannabis users. Measurements Each survey used the World Mental Health Survey Initiative version of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview version 3.0 (WMH-CIDI). Findings Among regular alcohol users, prevalence (95% confidence interval) of life-time ICD-11 alcohol harmful use and dependence were 21.6% (20.5-22.6%) and 7.0% (6.4-7.7%), respectively. Among cannabis users, 9.3% (7.4-11.1%) met criteria for ICD-11 harmful use and 3.2% (2.3-4.0%) for dependence. For both substances, all comparisons of ICD-11 with ICD-10 and DSM-IV showed excellent concordance (all kappa = 0.9). Concordance between ICD-11 and DSM-5 ranged from good (for SUD and comparisons of dependence and severe SUD) to poor (for comparisons of harmful use and mild SUD). Very low endorsement rates were observed for new ICD-11 feature for harmful use ('harm to others'). Minimal variation in clinical features was observed across diagnostic systems. Conclusions The World Health Organization's proposed International Classification of Diseases, 11th edition (ICD-11) classifications for substance use disorder diagnoses are highly consistent with the ICD 10th edition and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV). Concordance between ICD-11 and the DSM 5th edition (DSM-5) varies, due largely to low levels of agreement for the ICD harmful use and DSM-5 mild use disorder. Diagnostic validity of self-reported 'harm to others' is questionable.
机译:背景和旨在世界卫生组织(世卫组织)拟议的国际疾病分类,第11版(ICD-11)包括对物质使用障碍(SUD)诊断的若干主要修订。必须确保各种国家,语言和文化的主题诊断结果的一致性。迄今为止,不同泡沫诊断系统之间的协议分析主要基于高收入国家和临床样本而不是一般人群样本。我们的旨在使用ICD-11评估诊断之间的患病率,谁是谁的ICD第10版(ICD-10)以及精神障碍,第4和第5版(DSM-IV,DSM-5)的诊断和统计手册);分类ICD-10和ICD-11症状的患病率;诊断群体临床特征的变异。设计横断面家庭调查。在世界精神卫生调查倡议的世界精神卫生调查倡议中设定10个国家(阿根廷,澳大利亚,巴西,哥伦比亚,伊拉克,罗马尼亚和西班牙)的代表调查。参与者有关SUDS的问题,请问1282年常规酒精用户和1788万大麻用户。测量每个调查使用世界卫生组织综合国际诊断访谈版本3.0(WMH-CIDI)的世界精神健康调查倡议版本。常规酒精用户中的结果,生命时间ICD-11酒精有害使用和依赖的患病率(95%置信区间)分别为21.6%(20.5-22.6%)和7.0%(6.4-7.7%)。在大麻用户中,9.3%(7.4-11.1%)符合ICD-11有害使用的标准,3.2%(2.3-4.0%)依赖。对于这两种物质,ICD-11与ICD-10和DSM-IV的所有比较都表现出极佳的一致性(所有Kappa& = 0.9)。 ICD-11和DSM-5之间的一致性范围从良好(苏打和依赖和严重泡沫的比较)到贫困(用于有害使用和轻度SUD的比较)。对于新的ICD-11特征来说,观察到非常低的认可率,用于有害使用(对他人的伤害))。在诊断系统中观察到临床特征的最小变化。结论世界卫生组织拟议的国际疾病分类,第11版(ICD-11)物质使用障碍诊断的分类与ICD第10版和精神障碍,第4版(DSM-IV)的诊断和统计手册高度一致。 ICD-11和DSM第5版(DSM-5)之间的一致性因ICD有害用途和DSM-5轻度使用障碍而导致的低级别。自我报告的“对他人的伤害”的诊断有效性是值得怀疑的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号