首页> 外文期刊>Acta Radiologica >Outcome after prostatic artery embolization in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia
【24h】

Outcome after prostatic artery embolization in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

机译:症状良性前列腺增生患者前列腺动脉栓塞后的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has recently been described as a promising alternative treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to an enlarged, benign prostate. Purpose To evaluate the safety, morbidity, and functional outcomes after PAE. Material and Methods Twenty-nine consecutive patients were included. All patients had computed tomography angiography before the procedure. Microcatheters were used for selective embolization of the PAs. Large side branches to non-target organs were embolized with coils. The PAs were embolized with calibrated 300-500 mu m tris-acryl gelatin microspheres. Complications were recorded before discharge. Clinical visit was performed after three months, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after 6-12 months, and any further intervention recorded in the chart. Mean follow-up was 23 months. Clinical success was defined as no longer needing urinary catheter, no long-term complications, and no need of further interventions. Results Sixteen patients (55%) had permanent or intermittent catheter before the procedure. Bilateral embolization was performed in 26 patients (90%). Five patients underwent two procedures. Twelve of 16 patients (75%) with permanent or intermittent catheter were able to remove the catheter. Five patients were operated with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Except for one patient, all patients without catheter at baseline improved in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and had no further treatment. Twelve patients experienced complications; all were grade 1 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Conclusion PAE reduced LUTS symptoms in most patients without severe complications. The treatment did not exclude additional surgical treatment when needed.
机译:背景技术前列腺动脉栓塞(PAE)最近被描述为由于扩大的良性前列腺,最近被描述为对尿路症状(LUT)的有前途的替代治疗。目的是评估PAE后的安全性,发病率和功能结果。包括材料和方法29例连续患者。所有患者均在该程序之前已经计算过层析造影血管造影。微晕器用于选择性栓塞PAS。与线圈栓塞的非目标器官的大侧分支。将PAS与校准的300-500μmtris-丙烯酸明胶微球栓塞。在出院前记录并发症。在6-12个月后,磁共振成像(MRI)在三个月后进行临床访问,并在图表中记录任何进一步的干预。平均随访23个月。临床成功被定义为不再需要泌尿导管,没有长期并发症,不需要进一步的干预措施。结果16名患者(55%)在程序前具有永久性或间歇性导管。两侧栓塞在26例患者中进行(90%)。五名患者接受了两种程序。具有永久性或间歇导管的12名患者(75%)能够去除导管。使用前列腺切除前列腺(TURP)进行5名患者。除了一名患者外,所有没有导管的患者在基线上有所改善,在国际前列腺症状评分(IPS)中,没有进一步的治疗。十二名患者经历并发症;根据Clavien-Dindo分类,所有人都是1级。结论PAE在大多数患者中减少了LUTS症状,没有严重并发症。治疗不在需要时排除额外的手术治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号