首页> 外文期刊>Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica: Official Publication of the Nordisk Forening for Obstetrik och Gynekologi >Incidences of obstetric outcomes and sample size calculations: A Danish national registry study based on all deliveries from 2008 to 2015
【24h】

Incidences of obstetric outcomes and sample size calculations: A Danish national registry study based on all deliveries from 2008 to 2015

机译:产科结果和样品大小计算的发生率:基于2008年至2015年的所有交货的丹麦国家登记研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction In high-income countries the majority of pregnancies have a good outcome, and many adverse obstetric outcomes rarely occur. This makes demonstrating clinically relevant and statistically significant effects of new interventions a challenge. The objective of the study was to report incidences of important obstetric outcomes and to calculate sample sizes for tentative studies. Material and methods The study was a registry-based study. Data were retrieved from the Danish Medical Birth Registry and included all deliveries in Denmark from 2008 to 2015. The total population included 465 919 deliveries. The study population comprised intended vaginal deliveries with a single fetus in cephalic presentation at term (n = 381 567). Incidences were reported for 20 outcomes considering the relevance for the patients and the severity of the outcomes. We calculated the sample sizes required in tentative obstetric studies to detect risk reductions of 25 and 50%, for tests at the 5% level, using a power of 80 and 90%. For the randomized controlled trials we calculated the sample size required for comparing two proportions with equal-sized groups. For the cohort study we calculated the sample size also required for two proportions but with unequal sized groups. Outcome measures for sample size calculation were neonatal mortality, Apgar score The incidence of neonatal mortality, Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes and emergency cesarean section was 0.05, 0.58 and 10.5%, respectively. Using neonatal mortality as the outcome in a tentative randomized controlled trial with an expected risk reduction of 50% and power of 80%, our calculation showed a sample size of 195 036 deliveries. Using Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes or emergency cesarean section as the outcome, 16 254 and 818 deliveries, respectively, were required. In tentative cohort studies, the required sample sizes were larger due to the unequal proportion of exposed/non-exposed women. Conclusions Most adverse obstetric outcomes occur rarely; thus, very large sample sizes are required to achieve adequate statistical power in randomized controlled trials. Multicenter studies, international collaborations or alternative study designs to randomized controlled trials could be considered.
机译:在高收入国家的介绍,大多数怀孕都有很好的结果,很少发生许多不利产科结果。这使得临床相关和统计学上的临床相关和统计学意义的挑战挑战。该研究的目的是报告重要产科结果的发病,并计算出暂定研究的样本尺寸。材料和方法该研究是一项基于注册表的研究。从丹麦医疗出生登记处检索数据,并包括2008年至2015年丹麦的所有交货。总人口包括465 919个交付。该研究人群包含预期的阴道递送,术语在头部呈现中具有单个胎儿(n = 381 567)。据报告了20次成果,考虑到患者的相关性和结果的严重程度。我们计算了试探性研究所需的样本尺寸,以检测25%和50%的风险减少,用于5%水平的试验,使用80%和90%。对于随机对照试验,我们计算了比较两种与相等大小的组的比较所需的样本大小。对于队列研究,我们计算了两种比例,但大小的群体也需要计算样品大小。结果尺寸计算的结果措施是新生儿死亡率,APGAR评分新生儿死亡率的发生率,APGAR评分<7,5分钟,急诊剖宫产分别为0.05,0.58和10.5%。使用新生儿死亡率作为暂定随机对照试验的结果,预期风险降低50%和80%,我们的计算显示了195 036次产量的样本量。在5分钟或紧急剖宫产中使用APGAR评分<7分别为结果,分别需要16个254和818分娩。在暂定的队列研究中,由于暴露/非暴露女性的不平等比例,所需的样品尺寸更大。结论大多数不良产科结果很少发生;因此,需要非常大的样品尺寸来实现随机对照试验中的充分统计功率。可以考虑多中心研究,国际合作或替代研究对随机对照试验的设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号