首页> 外文期刊>Acta Geotechnica: An International journal for Geoengineering >A full-scale field study for performance evaluation of axially loaded large-diameter cylinder piles with pipe piles and PSC piles
【24h】

A full-scale field study for performance evaluation of axially loaded large-diameter cylinder piles with pipe piles and PSC piles

机译:管桩和PSC桩轴向装载大直径圆柱桩性能评价的全规模实地研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents the results from a pile load testing program for a bridge construction project in Louisiana. The testing includes two 54-in. open-ended spun cast concrete cylinder piles, one 30-in. open-ended steel pile and two (30- and 16-in.) square prestressed concrete (PSC) piles driven at two locations with very similar soil conditions. Both cone penetration tests (CPTs) and soil borings/laboratory testing were used to characterize the subsurface soil conditions. All the test piles were instrumented with vibrating wire strain gauges to measure the load distribution along the length of the test piles and measure the skin friction and end-bearing capacity, separately. Dynamic load tests were performed on all test piles at different times after pile installations to quantify the amount of setup with time. Static load tests were also performed on the PSC and open-ended steel piles. Due to expected large pile capacities, the statnamic test method was used on the two open-ended cylinder piles. The pile capacities of these piles were evaluated using various CPT methods (such as Schmertmann, De Ruiter and Beringen, LCPC, Lehane et al. methods). The result showed that all the methods can estimate the skin friction with good accuracy, but not the end-bearing capacity. The normalized cumulative blow counts during pile installation showed that the blow count was always higher for the PSC piles compared to the large-diameter open-ended cylinder pile, regardless of pile size and hammer size. Setup was observed for all the piles, which was mainly attributed to increase in skin frictions. The setup parameters "A" were back-calculated for all the test piles and the values were between 0.31 and 0.41.
机译:本文介绍了路易斯安那州桥梁建设项目的桩载试验计划的结果。测试包括两个54 in。开放式纺铸混凝土缸桩,一个30英寸。开放式钢桩和两个(30-和16英寸)的方形预应力混凝土(PSC)桩在两个位置驱动,具有非常相似的土壤条件。锥形渗透试验(CPTS)和土壤硼管/实验室测试都用于表征地下土壤条件。所有测试桩均用振动线应变仪仪器仪表,以沿着试验桩的长度测量负载分布,并分别测量皮肤摩擦和终端承载能力。在桩安装后的不同时间对所有测试桩进行动态负载测试,以通过时间量化设置量。在PSC和开放式钢桩上也进行了静载试验。由于预期的大桩容量,在两个开放式圆柱桩上使用了佐际测试方法。使用各种CPT方法评估这些桩的桩容量(例如Schmertmann,De Ruiter和Beringen,LCPC,Lehane等方法)。结果表明,所有方法都可以以良好的精度估计皮肤摩擦,但不是终端承受能力。与大直径开口圆柱桩相比,PSC桩的归一化累积吹击计数表明,与大口径开口圆柱桩相比,PSC桩始终较高,无论桩尺寸和锤尺寸。所有桩都观察到设置,主要归因于皮肤摩擦的增加。为所有测试桩进行回计算设置参数“A”,值为0.31和0.41。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号