...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta ophthalmologica >Evaluation of different Swept’Source optical coherence tomography angiography ( SS SS ‐ OCTA OCTA ) slabs for the detection of features of diabetic retinopathy
【24h】

Evaluation of different Swept’Source optical coherence tomography angiography ( SS SS ‐ OCTA OCTA ) slabs for the detection of features of diabetic retinopathy

机译:不同扫描的源光学相干断层造影血管造影(SS - Octa Octa)板的评价用于检测糖尿病视网膜病变的特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Purpose To compare different Swept‐Source optical coherence tomography angiography ( SS ‐ OCTA ) slabs for the detection of features of diabetic retinopathy ( DR ), to find the most suitable slab for grading. Methods Retrospective cross‐sectional study. Consecutive patients with DR were evaluated using SS ‐ OCTA . The central 12?×?12?mm scan was used to generate the retinal, superficial and deep slab. The grading results of the slabs were then compared to determine if one specific slab is superior to detect respective features. Results A total of 348 eyes (190 patients; mean age 58.1?±?14.5?years) were graded for features of DR . The retinal slab detected most frequently MA s and IRMA s, however with no significant difference compared to the superficial slab (p?=?0.93 and p?=?0.93, respectively). Small capillary dropout was most frequently found on the superficial slab, but there was no significant difference compared with the retinal (p?=?0.78) and deep slab (p?=?0.45). The only statistically significant difference was found for large capillary dropout, where the retinal and superficial slab showed a higher detection rate compared with the deep slab (p?≤?0.0001 and p?=?0.001, respectively). Conclusions The superficial and retinal slabs are equally suitable for grading with no statistically significant difference in the detection rate of the diabetic features examined.
机译:摘要目的,用于比较不同的扫描源光学相干性断层造影血管造影(SS - Octa)Slab用于检测糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的特征,找到最合适的分级板。方法回顾性横截面研究。使用SS - Octa评估患有DR的连续患者。中心12?×12?mm扫描用于产生视网膜,肤浅和深板。然后比较板坯的分级结果以确定一个特定板坯是否优于检测各个特征。结果共348只眼睛(190名患者;平均58.1岁?±14.5岁)被评分博士的特征。视网膜平板检测到最常见的MA S和IRMA S,然而与浅表平板相比没有显着差异(P?= 0.93和p?= 0.93)。浅表平板上最常见的小毛细管辍学,但与视网膜(P?= 0.78)和深板(P≥1.0.45)没有显着差异(p?= 0.45)。对大毛细管辍学的唯一统计学显着差异,视网膜和浅表平板与深板相比显示出更高的检测率(P?≤≤0.0001和p?= 0.001)。结论浅表和视网膜板同样适用于患者检测率没有统计学上显着的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号