首页> 外文期刊>Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics >Biomechanical properties of alternative suture technique for flexor tendon repair
【24h】

Biomechanical properties of alternative suture technique for flexor tendon repair

机译:屈肌肌腱修复替代缝合技术的生物力学特性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: Flexor injuries are most common in the hand and require special attention and experience from the surgeon. Both quality and technique affect the stability of the suture. The selection of the optimum method will influence the process of rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to compare three different suture techniques based on the strength, depending on the method of breakage, i.e., axial or pulley load. Methods: The study was divided into six sessions. The research material was dissected deep flexor porcine tendons. Three types of stitches were used: the modified Kessler suture with an additional running suture, the cruciate four-strand suture with an additional running suture and the multistrand running suture. We obtained 120 sutures, 40 for each technique. Breaking strength was assessed using a tensile machine in two ways, i.e., axial or pulley load, with 20 sutures per group. Results: The strongest suture for both axial and pulley load was the cruciate four-strand suture. Between the multistrand running suture and the modified Kessler suture, there was no statistically significant difference in the strength of breaking for both axial and pulley load. Comparing the two ways of breaking, there was no statistically significant difference in the strength of the suture. Conclusions: The multistrand running locking suture is a good alternative to widely used core sutures. It not only provides the same strength as other techniques examined by us but also reduces the procedure time and trauma to the tips of the tendon.
机译:目的:屈肌伤害在手中最常见,需要特别关注和经验。质量和技术都会影响缝合线的稳定性。选择最佳方法将影响康复过程。本研究的目的是基于强度比较三种不同的缝合技术,这取决于破损的方法,即轴向或滑轮载荷。方法:该研究分为六次会议。研究材料被解剖了深屈肌猪筋。使用了三种类型的缝线:改性的Kessler缝合线,额外的缝合线,这款四股缝合线与额外的运行缝合线和多铃木运行缝合线。我们获得了120个缝合线,每种技术40。使用拉伸机以两种方式评估破碎强度,即轴向或滑轮载荷,每组20个缝合线。结果:轴向和滑轮载荷的最强缝合线是十字架的四股缝合线。在多点运行缝合线和改进的Kessler缝合线之间,轴向和滑轮载荷的断裂强度没有统计学显着差异。比较两种破裂方式,缝合线的强度没有统计学上的差异。结论:多利石运行锁定缝合线是广泛使用的核心缝合线的替代方案。它不仅提供了与我们检查的其他技术相同的强度,而且还将程序时间和创伤减少到肌腱的尖端。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号