...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >Does Empathy Decline in the Clinical Phase of Medical Education? A Nationwide, Multi-Institutional, Cross-Sectional Study of Students at DO-Granting Medical Schools
【24h】

Does Empathy Decline in the Clinical Phase of Medical Education? A Nationwide, Multi-Institutional, Cross-Sectional Study of Students at DO-Granting Medical Schools

机译:医学教育的临床阶段是否会下降? 授予医学院学生的全国范围内,多机构,横断面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose To examine differences in students’ empathy in different years of medical school in a nationwide study of students of U.S. DO-granting medical schools. Method Participants in this cross-sectional study included 10,751 students enrolled in 41 of 48 campuses of DO-granting medical schools in the United States (3,616 first-year, 2,764 second-year, 2,413 third-year, and 1,958 fourth-year students). They completed a web-based survey at the end of the 2017–2018 academic year that included the Jefferson Scale of Empathy and the Infrequency Scale of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire for measuring “good impression” response bias. Comparisons were made on empathy scores among students in different years of medical school using analysis of covariance, controlling for the effect of “good impression” response bias. Also, comparisons were made with preexisting data from students of U.S. MD-granting medical schools. Results A statistically significant decline in empathy scores was observed when comparing students in the preclinical (years 1 and 2) and the clinical (years 3 and 4) phases of medical school ( P < .001); however, the magnitude of the decline was negligible (effect size =0.13). Comparison of findings with MD students showed that while the pattern of empathy decline was similar, the magnitude of the decline was less pronounced in DO students. Conclusions Differences in DO-granting and MD-granting medical education systems, such as emphasis on provision of holistic care, hands-on approaches to diagnosis and treatment, and patient-centered care, provide plausible explanations for disparity in the magnitude of empathy decline in DO compared with MD students. More research is needed to examine changes in empathy in longitudinal study and explore reasons for changes to avert erosion of empathy in medical school.
机译:目的在美国授予医学院学生的全国范围内学习医学院学生同理心的差异。这种横断面研究中的方法参与者包括10,751名学生在美国授予48个校园中的41名中的10,751名学生(3,616名第一年,2,764秒,2,413次和1,958名学生) 。他们在2017 - 2018年学年结束时完成了基于网络的调查,其中包括杰斐逊的同理心和Zuckerman-Kuhlman人格调查问卷的少量规模,用于测量“良好的印象”反应偏见。使用协方差分析,对医学院不同年的学生同情分数进行了比较,控制“良好印象”反应偏差的影响。此外,来自美国MD授予医学院的学生的预先存在的数据进行了比较。结果观察到在临床前(1和2年)和医学院的临床(3和4)阶段比较学生时,观察到同理心评分的统计学意义下降(P <.001);然而,下降的大小可以忽略不计(效果大小= 0.13)。与MD学生的调查结果比较表明,虽然同情下降的模式相似,但学生的衰退的程度不太明显。结论否认授予医疗教育系统的差异,例如强调提供全面护理,实践诊断和治疗方法,以患者为中心的护理,为差距的差异提供了可符号的解释与MD学生相比。需要更多的研究来检查纵向研究中的同理心的变化,并探讨改变理由,以避免医学院的同理心侵蚀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号