首页> 外文期刊>Abdominal radiology. >Performance of a machine learning-based decision model to help clinicians decide the extent of lymphadenectomy (D1 vs. D2) in gastric cancer before surgical resection
【24h】

Performance of a machine learning-based decision model to help clinicians decide the extent of lymphadenectomy (D1 vs. D2) in gastric cancer before surgical resection

机译:基于机器学习的决策模型的性能,帮助临床医生在手术切除前决定胃癌淋巴结切除术(D1 vs.D2)的程度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Controversy still exists on the optimal surgical resection for potentially curable gastric cancer (GC). Use of radiologic evaluation and machine learning algorithms might predict extent of lymphadenectomy to limit unnecessary surgical treatment. We purposed to design a machine learning-based clinical decision-support model for predicting extent of lymphadenectomy (D1 vs. D2) in local advanced GC. Methods Clinicoradiologic features available from routine clinical assignments in 557 patients with GCs were retrospectively interpreted by an expert panel blinded to all histopathologic information. All patients underwent surgery using standard D2 resection. Decision models were developed with a logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM) and auto-encoder (AE) algorithm in 371 training and tested in 186 test data, respectively. The primary end point was to measure diagnostic performance of decision model and a Japanese gastric cancer treatment guideline version 4th (JPN 4th) criteria for discriminate D1 (pT1 +pN0) versus D2 (>=pT1 +>=pN1) lymphadenectomy. Results The decision model with AE analysis produced highest area under ROC curve (train: 0.965, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.948-0.978; test: 0.946, 95% CI 0.925-0.978), followed by SVM (train: 0.925, 95% CI 0.902-0.944; test: 0.942, 95% CI 0.922-0.973) and LR (train: 0.886, 95% CI 0.858-0.910; test: 0.891, 95% CI 0.891-0.952). By this improvement, overtreatment was reduced from 21.7% (121/557) by treat-all pattern, to 15.1% (84/557) by JPN 4th criteria, and to 0.7-0.9% (4-5/557) by the new approach. Conclusions The decision model with machine learning analysis demonstrates high accuracy for identifying patients who are candidates for D1 versus D2 resection. Its approximate 14-20% improvements in overtreatment compared to treat-all pattern and JPN 4th criteria potentially increase the number of patients with local advanced GCs who can safely avoid unnecessary lymphadenectomy.
机译:背景技术争议仍然存在于潜在可固化的胃癌(GC)的最佳手术切除上。放射学评估和机器学习算法的使用可能预测淋巴结切除术的程度,以限制不必要的手术治疗。我们旨在设计一种基于机器学习的临床决策支持模型,用于预测局部高级GC中淋巴结切除术(D1对D2)的程度。方法常规临床临床分配可获得的临床临床作用可供GCS患者的临床临床作用,由对所有组织病理学信息蒙蔽的专家面板回顾性地解释。所有患者使用标准D2切除术后术后手术。决策模型是用逻辑回归(LR),支持向量机(SVM)和自动编码器(AE)算法的371次训练和186个测试数据测试。主要终点是测量决策模型的诊断性能和日本胃癌治疗指南第4版(JPN 4th)的区分D1(PT1 + PN0)标准与D2(> = Pt1 +> = PN1)淋巴结切除术。结果AE分析决策模型在ROC曲线下产生了最高面积(火车:0.965,95%置信区间(CI)0.948-0.978;测试:0.946,95%CI 0.925-0.978,其次是SVM(火车:0.925,95 %CI 0.902-0.944;测试:0.942,95%CI 0.922-0.973)和LR(火车:0.886,95%CI 0.858-0.910;测试:0.891,95%CI 0.891-0.952)。通过这种改进,通过治疗 - 所有模式,通过JPN第四标准,通过治疗 - 所有模式减少21.7%(121/557),并通过新的标准和0.7-0.9%(4-5 / 557)的15.1%(84/557)。方法。结论机器学习分析的决策模型表明了鉴定D1对D2切除患者的患者的高精度。其近似14-20%的过度改善与治疗 - 所有模式和JPN第4标准相比可能增加了可以安全地避免不必要的淋巴结切除术的局部高级GCS患者的数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号