首页> 外文期刊>Abdominal radiology. >Pearls and pitfalls of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 non-target lesion assessment
【24h】

Pearls and pitfalls of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 non-target lesion assessment

机译:实体肿瘤响应评估标准的珍珠和陷阱(RECIST)V1.1非目标病变评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Oncologic imaging is an important facet of abdominal imaging that radiologists encounter nearly every day. Many oncology clinical trials utilize response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 which divides tumor sites into target and non-target lesions. Although RECIST v1.1 provides clear instructions regarding the use of imaging in clinical trials, errors in response assessment still occur using these criteria. This is especially true of response assessment with regards to non-target lesions which involve rules which are less well-defined and somewhat subjective. This pictorial essay will review RECIST v1.1 guidelines and common non-target lesion errors which can occur at baseline and follow-up response assessment.
机译:肿瘤成像是腹部成像的重要方面,即放射科医生几乎每天都在遇到。 许多肿瘤学临床试验利用实体肿瘤的响应评估标准(RECIST)1.1版,其将肿瘤部位分成靶和非靶病变。 虽然RECIST V1.1提供了有关在临床试验中使用成像的明确说明,但使用这些标准仍会发生响应评估的错误。 对于关于非目标病变的响应评估尤其如此,这涉及涉及不太明确的规则和有些主观的规则。 此图表文章将审核Recist V1.1指南和常见的非目标病变错误,这些错误可能发生在基线和后续响应评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号