首页> 外文期刊>Acta Geophysica >Comparative Study of Models for Predicting Permeability from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Logs in Two Chinese Tight Sandstone Reservoirs
【24h】

Comparative Study of Models for Predicting Permeability from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Logs in Two Chinese Tight Sandstone Reservoirs

机译:两种中国致密砂岩油藏通过核磁共振测井预测渗透率模型的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Based on the analysis of mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experimental data for core plugs, which were drilled from two Chinese tight sandstone reservoirs, permeability prediction models, such as the classical SDR, Timur– Coates, the Swanson parameter, the Capillary Parachor, the R10 and R35 models, are calibrated to estimating permeabilities from field NMR logs, and the applicabilities of these permeability prediction models are compared. The processing results of several field examples show that the SDR model is unavailable in tight sandstone reservoirs. The Timur-Coates model is effective once the optimal T_(2cutoff) can be acquired to accurately calculate FFI and BVI from field NMR logs. The Swanson parameter model and the Capillary Parachor model are not always available in tight sandstone reservoirs. The R35 based model cannot effectively work in tight sandstone reservoirs, while the R10 based model is optimal in permeability prediction.
机译:基于对两个中国致密砂岩油藏钻探的注汞毛细压力(MICP)和核磁共振(NMR)实验数据的基础上,渗透率预测模型,例如经典SDR,Timur–Coates,校准了Swanson参数,毛细管Parachor,R10和R35模型,以便根据现场NMR测井估算渗透率,并比较了这些渗透率预测模型的适用性。几个现场实例的处理结果表明,在致密砂岩油藏中,SDR模型不可用。一旦可以获取最佳T_(2cutoff)来从现场NMR测井中准确计算FFI和BVI,则Timur-Coates模型就会有效。致密砂岩储层中并不总是可以使用Swanson参数模型和毛细管Parachor模型。基于R35的模型不能在致密砂岩储层中有效地工作,而基于R10的模型在渗透率预测中是最佳的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号