...
首页> 外文期刊>Current psychiatry reports >A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders
【24h】

A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders

机译:对人格障碍替代DSM-5模型研究的简要但全面审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose of Review Both the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the chapter on personality disorders (PD) in the recent version of ICD-11 embody a shift from a categorical to a dimensional paradigm for the classification of PD. We describe these new models, summarize available measures, and provide a comprehensive review of research on the AMPD. Recent Findings A total of 237 publications on severity (criterion A) and maladaptive traits (criterion B) of the AMPD indicate (a) acceptable interrater reliability, (b) largely consistent latent structures, (c) substantial convergence with a range of theoretically and clinically relevant external measures, and (d) some evidence for incremental validity when controlling for categorical PD diagnoses. However, measures of criterion A and B are highly correlated, which poses conceptual challenges. The AMPD has stimulated extensive research with promising findings. We highlight open questions and provide recommendations for future research.
机译:审查人格障碍(AMPD)替代DSM-5模型的目的和关于ICD-11最近版本的人格障碍(PD)的章节与PD分类的分类实施了从分类到维度范式的转变。我们描述了这些新型号,总结了可用措施,并对AMPD进行了全面审查。最近的发现总共237个出版物(标准A)和AMPD的不良性特征(标准B)表明(a)可接受的Interray可靠性,(b)在大致一致的潜在结构,(c)在理论上的一系列和一系列的大量收敛性临床相关的外部措施,以及(d)控制分类PD诊断时的增量有效性的一些证据。然而,标准A和B的措施是高度相关的,这构成了概念性挑战。随着有希望的发现,AMPD已经刺激了广泛的研究。我们突出开放式问题,并为未来的研究提供建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号