首页> 外文期刊>Current Eye Research >Accuracy of Modified Axial Length Adjustment for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Chinese Axial Myopic Eyes
【24h】

Accuracy of Modified Axial Length Adjustment for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Chinese Axial Myopic Eyes

机译:中国轴向近视眼中眼内透镜功率计算改进轴向长度调节的精度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of modified Wang-Koch adjustment for intraocular lens power calculation in axial myopic eyes at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China. Materials and Methods: Consecutive cataract patients with axial lengths (ALs) over 25.0 mm were enrolled. The accuracies of SRK/T and Holladay 1 with modified Wang-Koch AL adjustment were compared with those calculated with optimized lens constants for long eyes and lens constants from the User Group for Laser Interference Biometry. They were also compared with Barrett Universal II (Barrett) and Haigis. The median absolute error (AE), mean absolute error (MAE) and proportions of eyes with a prediction error (PE) within +/- 0.25 diopter (D), +/- 0.50 D and +/- 1.00 D were determined. Results: In total, 325 eyes from patients with a mean age of 58.62 +/- 13.51 years and a mean preoperative AL of 27.65 +/- 2.05 mm were included. For SRK/T, Wang-Koch adjustment did not increase the proportion of eyes within the given diopter of PE in any AL subgroup and led to worse outcomes for ALs between 27.0 mm and 30.0 mm (n = 129; P = .001) compared to the method of using measured AL and optimized constant. For Holladay 1, comparison of PEs within +/- 0.50 D favored AL adjusted eyes in all subgroups. Moreover, the median AE of Holladay 1 with Wang-Koch adjustment in eyes with ALs between 25.0 mm and 27.0 mm was lower than that of Barrett (n = 146; P = .02). Conclusions: The modified Wang-Koch adjustment had better performance than constant optimization for Holladay 1 but not for SRK/T. Holladay 1 with Wang-Koch adjustment was more accurate than Barrett for ALs between 25.0 mm and 27.0 mm.
机译:目的:评估中山眼科中心轴近代眼内岩体电力计算改良王 - 科赫调整的准确性。材料和方法:注册了超过25.0mm轴长(ALS)的连续白内障患者。将SRK / T和HOLLADAY 1的精度与改性的Wang-Koch Al调节进行了比较,与来自用户组的长眼睛和透镜常数的优化透镜常数计算,用于激光干扰生物法。他们也与Barrett Universal II(Barrett)和Haigis进行了比较。确定中位绝对误差(AE),平均误差(MAE)和预测误差(PE)内的眼睛的比例(PE)确定,确定。结果:总共325只眼睛,平均年龄为58.62 +/- 13.51岁,包括27.65 +/- 2.05 mm的平均术前Al。对于SRK / T,王 - koch调节并未增加任何Al亚组的给定屈光度内的眼睛的比例,并导致27.0mm和30.0mm之间的als的结果更差(n = 129; p = .001)。比较到使用测量的Al和优​​化常数的方法。对于Holladay 1,PES在+/- 0.50d中的PES中的比较有利于所有亚组的Al调整眼睛。此外,在25.0mm和27.0mm之间的眼睛中具有王-koch调节的Holladay 1的中位AE低于Barrett(n = 146; p = .02)。结论:改良的王 - koch调整比荷兰语1的恒定优化具有更好的性能,但不适用于SRK / T.随着25.0毫米和27.0毫米的ALS,Holladay 1与王 - koch调节更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号