首页> 外文期刊>Acta oecologica >Comparison of seed rain and seed limitation between community understory and gaps in a subtropical evergreen forest
【24h】

Comparison of seed rain and seed limitation between community understory and gaps in a subtropical evergreen forest

机译:亚热带常绿森林种子林与林下种子间隙与种子限制的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Treefall gaps have been identified as important sites for plant recruitment. In this study, we compared seed rain between forest gaps and forest interior using 150 seed traps in the understory and 19 traps in gaps in a 24 ha permanent plot of subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in East China. We asked how total seed abundance and seed species richness, the relative representation of different dispersal modes, and seed limitation and its components differed between canopy gaps and the understory. Results showed that most of the species found in both the understory and in gaps were animal-dispersal, but most of the seed rain was comprised of wind-dispersed species in both habitats. No significant differences in either density or diversity of seeds between gaps and non-gap sites were found. Contrary to expectations, wind-dispersed seeds did not occur significantly more in treefall gaps than in the forest understory. There were also no significant differences in seed limitation and its components (source limitation, dispersal limitation) between the understory and gaps. Seed limitation was strong for all but a few of the best-dispersed species in both gap and understory seed traps. Source and dispersal limitation showed large inter-specific variation in both the understory and in gaps. Overall, our results indicate that: (i) gaps may play a neutral role in maintaining seed diversity in this subtropical forest; (ii) under strong seed limitation both in gaps and in the understory, population and community dynamics slows and ecological drift in species composition may become a more important determinant of community structure.
机译:树木缺口已被确认为植物募集的重要场所。在这项研究中,我们比较了中国东部亚热带常绿阔叶林的24公顷永久性林下层中的150个种子陷阱和19个空白中的陷阱,比较了森林间隙和森林内部之间的种子雨。我们询问了冠层间隙和林下层之间的总种子丰度和种子种类丰富度,不同分散模式的相对表示以及种子限制及其组成成分之间的差异。结果表明,在林下和缝隙中发现的大多数物种都是动物散布的,但是在两个生境中,大多数种子雨都是由风散布的物种组成的。在间隙和非间隙位点之间,种子的密度或多样性均无显着差异。与预期相反,在树隙中风散播种子的发生没有比林下空地多。地下空间和缺口之间的种子限制及其组成(来源限制,扩散限制)也没有显着差异。在间隙和地下诱捕器中,除少数最佳分散物种外,所有其他物种的种子限制都很强。来源和扩散限制表明,林下层和间隙均存在较大的种间差异。总的来说,我们的结果表明:(i)在该亚热带森林中,缺口可能在维持种子多样性方面起中性作用; (ii)在间隙和林下的种子均受到严格限制的情况下,种群和群落动态变慢,物种组成的生态漂移可能成为决定群落结构的更重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号