首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Titanium cages versus autogenous iliac crest bone grafts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion treatment of patients with cervical degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Titanium cages versus autogenous iliac crest bone grafts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion treatment of patients with cervical degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:钛笼与颈椎颈椎切除术和宫颈退行性疾病患者的骨质颈椎骨移植物(骨质退行性疾病的融合治疗):系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: A systematic review and partial meta-analysis is conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of anterior cervical decompression and fusion procedures employing either rectangular titanium cages or iliac crest autografts in patients suffering from cervical degenerative disc diseases.Methods: Medline, PubMed, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to June 2015, using the key words cervical discectomy; bone transplantation; titanium cages; and iliac crest autografts. Outcomes of interbody fusion rates were compared using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Values of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and visual analog scale before and after operation were also compared.Results: The rate of interbody fusion was similar between patients in the iliac crest autograft and titanium cage groups (pooled OR=0.33, 95% CI=0.07 to 1.66, P=.178). The overall analysis showed that patients in the two groups did not have significantly different post-surgery Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (pooled difference in means=-0.05, 95% CI=0.73 to 0.63, P=.876). Improvement in arm and neck pain scores were assessed with a visual analog scale and differed significantly between patients in the iliac crest autograft and titanium cage groups (pooled difference in means=0.16, 95% CI=-0.44 to 0.76, P=.610; and pooled difference in means=-0.44, 95% CI=-2.23 to 1.36, P=.634, respectively).Conclusions: Our results suggest that the use of titanium cages constitutes a safe and efficient alternative to iliac crest bone autografts for anterior cervical discectomy with fusion.
机译:目的:进行系统审查和部分荟萃分析,以比较颈椎减压和融合程序的疗效和安全性,患有颈椎退行性圆盘疾病的患者中的矩形钛笼或髂嵴自体移植物。方法:Medline,Pubmed,Central ,谷歌学者数据库在2015年6月开始搜索,使用关键词宫颈椎间盘切除术;骨移植;钛笼;和髂嵴自体移植物。使用具有95%置信区间(CIS)的差异比率(或)比较椎体间融合率的结果。还比较了日本矫形协会分数的值,以及操作前后的视觉模拟规模。结果:髂嵴自体移植和钛笼组患者之间的椎体融合率相似(合并或= 0.33,95%CI = 0.07至1.66,p = .178)。整体分析表明,两组患者的手术后患者没有明显不同日本矫形关联评分(汇总率= -0.05,95%CI = 0.73至0.63,P =。876)。通过视觉模拟规模评估手臂和颈部疼痛评分的改善,髂嵴自体移植物和钛笼组患者之间有显着不同(合并= 0.16,95%Ci = -0.44至0.76,P = .610;汇总差异= -0.44,95%ci = -2.23至1.36,p = .634,p = .634。结论:我们的结果表明,钛笼的使用构成了髂嵴骨自体移植物的安全有效替代前方颈椎切除术与融合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号