...
首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Adherence with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone versus levodopa/carbidopa and entacapone as separate tablets in patients with Parkinson's disease.
【24h】

Adherence with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone versus levodopa/carbidopa and entacapone as separate tablets in patients with Parkinson's disease.

机译:依赖Levodopa / carbidopa / Entacapone与左倍泮/ carbidopa和entacapone作为帕金森病患者的单独片剂。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest that single-tablet formulations are associated with improved adherence versus the same components taken as separate tablets. The objective of this study was to compare adherence in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) receiving levodopa therapy as levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone tablets (LCE) versus levodopa/carbidopa (LC) tablets and entacapone (E) as separate tablets (LC and E). METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using a large health insurance claims database. Subjects included persons with a PD diagnosis who were receiving LC without E and then received either an add-on therapy with E as a separate tablet (LC and E) or LCE as one tablet (LCE). The primary study outcome was treatment adherence, estimated from pharmacy refills based on the 'percent of days covered' (PDC) with LCE or LC and E during follow-up and compared for patients receiving LCE and LC and E using multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: In multivariate analyses controlling for differences between groups in baseline characteristics, including pre-index dosage of and adherence with LC, receipt of LCE (n = 388) was associated with 79% lower mean non-adherence during follow-up (95% CI: 73-83%; p < 0.001) versus LC and E (n = 823), 86% lower odds of unsatisfactory adherence (95% CI: 80-91%; p < 0.001), and a 26% lower risk of discontinuation (95% CI: 6-42%; p < 0.013). LIMITATIONS: This was an observational study with the inherent potential for selection bias. Pharmacy claims may not provide an accurate estimate of adherence. Requiring subjects to have a certain number of prescriptions before and after the index date may yield a sample that is not representative of all patients initiating levodopa therapy in typical clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Better adherence with LCE may have important implications for maintaining function in patients receiving chronic oral levodopa therapy. Further research is needed to confirm these results and examine the association between improved adherence and clinical and economic outcomes.
机译:背景:观察性研究表明,单片配方与改善的粘附性相关,与作为单独的片剂相同的组分。本研究的目的是将帕金森病(Pd)患者的依赖性与左旋多巴/肉(LC)与左旋多泮/碳粉盆(LC)片剂和Entacapone(E)作为单独的片剂(LC和E. )。方法:这是一种回顾性,观察队列使用大型健康保险索赔数据库的研究。受试者包括患有PD诊断的人,该诊断接受LC的没有E,然后接受e作为单独的片剂(LC和E)或LCE作为一种片剂(LCE)的加入治疗。主要研究结果是治疗遵守,从药房重新填充基于在随访期间的LCE或LC和e的“覆盖”(PDC)的“百分比”(PDC)和E的百分比估计,并且对接受LCE和LC和E使用多元回归分析的患者进行比较。结果:在多变量分析中,控制基线特征中的基团之间的差异,包括与LC的预指数剂量和粘附性,接收到LCE(n = 388)与随访期间的79%的非粘附性有关(95% CI:73-83%; p <0.001)对LC和E(n = 823),依发性依赖性的86%越低(95%CI:80-91%; P <0.001),风险较低26%停药(95%CI:6-42%; P <0.013)。局限性:这是一个观察性研究,具有选择偏差的固有潜力。药房声称可能无法提供对依从性的准确估计。在指数日期之前和之后,需要对受试者具有一定数量的处方可以产生不代表在典型的临床实践中引发左旋多巴治疗的所有患者的样本。结论:对LCE的更好依从性可能对维持慢性口服左旋多巴治疗患者的功能具有重要意义。需要进一步的研究来确认这些结果并检查改善遵守和临床和经济结果之间的关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号