首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Safety and efficacy of levofloxacin 750 mg for 2 weeks or 3 weeks compared with levofloxacin 500 mg for 4 weeks in treating chronic bacterial prostatitis.
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of levofloxacin 750 mg for 2 weeks or 3 weeks compared with levofloxacin 500 mg for 4 weeks in treating chronic bacterial prostatitis.

机译:与左氧氟沙星500mg治疗慢性细菌前列腺炎的左氧氟沙星(500mg)相比,左氧氟沙星的安全性和疗效2周或3周。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of levofloxacin 750 mg QD for 2 weeks or levofloxacin 750 mg QD for 3 weeks to levofloxacin 500 mg QD for 4 weeks in treating chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, noninferiority study. The primary efficacy end point was investigator assessment of clinical success in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population at post-therapy. National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) scores were utilized to evaluate subject-reported responses post-therapy. RESULTS: A total of 241 subjects were enrolled. At post-therapy (test of cure [TOC]), clinical success rates for levofloxacin-treated subjects (750 mg QD for 3 weeks [64.9%, 48/74]) were noninferior to 500 mg QD for 4 weeks (69.3%, 52/75: 95% CI, -19.5%, 10.6%). Success rates with levofloxacin 750 mg QD for 2 weeks (63.0%, 46/73) were not noninferior to therapy with levofloxacin 500 mg QD for 4 weeks (95% CI, -21.5%, 8.9%) at TOC. At 3 and 6 months post-therapy, clinical success rates were clinically higher for the 500-mg, 4-week treatment group, and statistical analysis demonstrated both groups were not noninferior to standard therapy with levofloxacin 500 mg (95% CI, -32.5%, -0.6% for both 750-mg groups at 6 months). NIH-CPSI scores showed similar trends. Overall, adverse event (AE) rates were similar for the three treatment groups; however, discontinuation of therapy due to AEs was higher with the 750-mg dose (p = 0.02, and p = 0.13 for 750 mg, 2 weeks and 750 mg, 3 weeks versus 500 mg for 4 weeks, respectively). The main limitation of this study was that no bacterial cultures were required. CONCLUSIONS: Higher doses for shorter durations were determined to be no worse than standard therapy with levofloxacin 500 mg for a longer duration at the TOC visit. However, at the 6-month follow-up visit, the levofloxacin 750-mg dose administered for either 2 weeks or 3 weeks was inferior to the standard therapy, suggesting that a longer duration of treatment may help extend the relapse-free interval in patients with CBP. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, nct00402688.
机译:目的:比较左氧氟沙星750mg QD的安全性和疗效2周或左氧氟沙星750mg QD左旋氧氟沙星500mg QD治疗慢性细菌前列腺炎(CBP)的4周。研究设计和方法:这是一项随机,多中心,双盲,不合理研究。初级疗效终点是调查员对治疗后修饰意图(MITT)群体的临床成功的调查仪评估。国家疗养慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)评分分数评估治疗后的疗效。结果:共有241名科目。在治疗后(治愈的试验[TOC])中,左氧氟沙星治疗的受试者的临床成功率(750mg QD 3周[64.9%,48/74])不合理至500mg QD,4周(69.3%, 52/75:95%CI,-19.5%,10.6%)。左氧氟沙星的成功率为750mg QD 2周(63.0%,46/73)不与左氧氟沙星500mg QD治疗4周(95%CI,-21.5%,8.9%)。在治疗后3和6个月,500 mg,4周治疗组的临床成功率临床上较高,并且统计分析证明两组不与左氧氟沙星500mg(95%CI,-32.5在6个月内为750 mg组的%,-0.6%)。 NIH-CPSI分数显示出类似的趋势。总体而言,三个治疗组的不良事件(AE)率类似;然而,由于750mg剂量(P = 0.02,P = 0.13,750mg,2周和750mg,分别为500mg,4周,4周,4周,4周,持续450mg,4周,3周,4周,4周,4周,持续治疗治疗较高)。本研究的主要局限性是不需要细菌培养物。结论:较短的持续剂量的较高剂量决定与左氧氟沙星500mg的标准治疗较长,在TOC访问时持续时间较长。但是,在6个月的后续访问中,左旋氧氟沙星750-mg剂量施用2周或3周的剂量差不等于标准治疗,表明持续时间持续时间可能有助于延长患者的无复发间隔用CBP。临床试验登记:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT00402688。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号