...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Percutaneous coronary intervention for nonculprit vessels in cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
【24h】

Percutaneous coronary intervention for nonculprit vessels in cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

机译:非额外血管血管血管血管血管血管血管急性心肌梗死的经皮冠状动脉介入急性心肌梗死

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES:: We investigated the clinical impact of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with multivessel disease. DESIGN:: A prospective, multicenter, observational study. SETTING:: Cardiac ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS:: Between November 2005 and September 2010, 338 patients were selected. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock and 2) multivessel disease with successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the infarct-related artery. Patients were divided into multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention and culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention. INTERVENTIONS:: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:: Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Median follow-up duration was 224 days (interquartile range, 46-383 d). Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention was performed during the primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 60 patients (17.8%). In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention vs culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention, 31.7% vs 24.5%; p = 0.247). All-cause mortality during follow-up was not significantly different between the two groups after adjusting for patient, angiographic, and procedural characteristics as well as propensity scores for receiving multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (35.0% vs 30.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.61-1.86; p = 0.831). There were no significant differences between the groups in rates of major adverse cardiac events (41.7% vs 37.1%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.62-1.71; p = 0.908) and any revascularization (6.7% vs 4.7%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.51-6.89; p = 0.344). CONCLUSIONS:: Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention could not reduce the prevalence of mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
机译:目的::我们调查了多渴望冠状动脉干预在ST段升高心肌梗死中的临床影响,通过患有多血糖疾病的心形成冲击。设计::潜在,多中心,观察研究。设置::大学医院的心脏ICU。患者:: 2005年11月至2010年9月,选择了338名患者。纳入标准如下:1)ST段升高心肌梗死与血管生成休克和2)多型血液疾病,具有成功的梗死相关动脉的主要经皮冠状动脉介入。患者分为多型冠状动脉干预和罪魁祸首的经皮冠状动脉干预。干预::无。测量和主要结果::主要结果是全部导致死亡率。中位后续时间为224天(四分位数范围,46-383 D)。在60名患者的主要经皮冠状动脉干预期间进行多血管经皮冠状动脉干预(17.8%)。两组中,院内死亡率相似(多血管经皮冠状动脉干预率与尖锐的经皮冠状动脉干预,31.7%vs 24.5%; P = 0.247)。在调整患者,血管造影和程序特征后,两组的随访期间的全因死亡率并没有显着差异,以及接受多血管经皮冠状动脉干预的倾向分数(35.0%与30.6%;调整后的危险比,1.06; 95%CI,0.61-1.86; p = 0.831)。在主要不良心脏事件的率之间没有显着差异(41.7%vs 37.1%;调整后危险比,1.03; 95%CI,0.62-1.71; p = 0.908)和任何血运重建(6.7%vs 4.7%;调整后危险比,1.88; 95%CI,0.51-6.89; p = 0.344)。结论:: Multivessel经皮冠状动脉干预不能降低患者的患者中死亡率的患病率,其在初生经皮冠状动脉介入期间患有ST段抬高心肌梗死和多血管疾病。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Critical care medicine 》 |2014年第1期| 共9页
  • 作者单位

    Division of Cardiology Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul;

    Division of Cardiology Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul;

    Department of Medicine Inje University College of Medicine Haeundae Paik Hospital Busan South;

    Division of Cardiology Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul;

    Division of Cardiology Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul;

    Division of Cardiology Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul;

    Division of Cardiology Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul;

    Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Chonnam National University Gwangju South Korea;

    Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Seoul National University Seongnam South Korea;

    Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Yeungnam University Hospital Daegu South Korea;

    Division of Cardiology Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 护理学 ;
  • 关键词

    acute myocardial infarction; cardiogenic shock; revascularization;

    机译:急性心肌梗死;心绞痛;血运重建;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号