...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Using simulation to isolate physician variation in intensive care unit admission decision making for critically ill elders with end-stage cancer: a pilot feasibility study.
【24h】

Using simulation to isolate physician variation in intensive care unit admission decision making for critically ill elders with end-stage cancer: a pilot feasibility study.

机译:利用模拟将医疗术语分离医生变异,为临床癌症临床癌症的批判性患者:飞行员可行性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of high-fidelity simulation for studying variation in intensive care unit admission decision making for critically ill elders with end-stage cancer. DESIGN: Mixed qualitative and quantitative analysis of physician subjects participating in a simulation scenario using hospital set, actors, medical chart, and vital signs tracings. The simulation depicted a 78-yr-old man with metastatic gastric cancer, life-threatening hypoxia most likely attributable to cancer progression, and stable preferences to avoid intensive care unit admission and intubation. Two independent raters assessed the simulations and subjects completed a postsimulation web-based survey and debriefing interview. SETTING: Peter M. Winter Institute for Simulation Education and Research at the University of Pittsburgh. SUBJECTS: Twenty-seven hospital-based attending physicians, including 6 emergency physicians, 13 hospitalists, and 8 intensivists. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Outcomes included qualitative report of clinical verisimilitude during the debriefing interview, survey-reported diagnosis and prognosis, and observed treatment decisions. Independent variables included physician demographics, risk attitude, and reactions to uncertainty. All (100%) reported that the case and simulation were highly realistic, and their diagnostic and prognostic assessments were consistent with our intent. Eight physicians (29.6%) admitted the patient to the intensive care unit. Among the eight physicians who admitted the patient to the intensive care unit, three (37%) initiated palliation, two (25%) documented the patient's code status (do not intubate/do not resuscitate), and one intubated the patient. Among the 19 physicians who did not admit the patient to the intensive care unit, 13 (68%) initiated palliation and 5 (42%) documented code status. Intensivists and emergency physicians (p = 0.048) were more likely to admit the patient to the intensive care unit. Years since medical school graduation were inversely associated with the initiation of palliative care (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation can reproduce the decision context of intensive care unit triage for a critically ill patient with terminal illness. When faced with an identical patient, hospital-based physicians from the same institution vary significantly in their treatment decisions.
机译:目的:确定高保真仿真的可行性,用于研究重症监护型临床临床决策的变化,为临床癌症的批判性患者。设计:使用医院,演员,医学图表和生命体征描绘的模拟场景的医生科目的混合定性和定量分析。模拟描绘了一名78岁的老人,具有转移性胃癌,危及生命的缺氧,最有可能归因于癌症进展,稳定的偏好,以避免重症监护单位入场和插管。两个独立评估者评估了模拟和主题完成了基于网络的调查和汇报面试。环境:彼得M.匹兹堡大学冬季模拟教育研究所。主题:二十七家医院的主治医生,其中包括6名急诊医生,13名病员和8名强烈主义者。测量和主要结果:结果包括在汇报采访中,调查报告的诊断和预后以及观察治疗决策的临床临床假验的定性报告。独立变量包括医生人口统计学,风险态度和对不确定性的反应。所有(100%)报告说,案例和模拟是高度逼真的,它们的诊断和预后评估与我们的意图一致。八名医生(29.6%)承认患者到重症监护病房。在承认患者到重症监护病例的八个医生中,三次(37%)开始的痛苦,两(25%)记录了患者的代码状态(不要插管/不复苏),并且一个插管患者。在没有承认患者到重症监护病例的19个医生中,13名(68%)发起的粘土和5(42%)记录的代码状态。更有可能将患者纳入重症监护病例的强度和急诊医生(P = 0.048)。自从医学院毕业以来与姑息治疗的启动相关(P = 0.043)。结论:模拟可以重现强化护理机构分类的决定背景,为终端疾病患有批判性病患者。当面对相同的患者时,来自同一机构的医院的医生在其治疗决策中会显着变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号