首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Early Tracheostomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Comparison With Late Tracheostomy
【24h】

Early Tracheostomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Comparison With Late Tracheostomy

机译:严重创伤性脑损伤患者的早期气管造口术:荟萃分析和晚期气管造口术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Objectives: To elucidate the impact of early tracheostomy on hospitalization outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury. Data Sources: Lilacs, PubMed, and Cochrane databases were searched. The close-out date was August 8, 2018. Study Selection: Studies written in English, French, Spanish, or Portuguese with traumatic brain injury as the base trauma, clearly formulated question, patient’s admission assessment, minimum follow-up during hospital stay, and minimum of two in-hospital outcomes were selected. Retrospective studies, prospective analyses, and case series were included. Studies without full reports or abstract, commentaries, editorials, and reviews were excluded. Data Extraction: The study design, year, patient’s demographics, mean time between admission and tracheostomy, neurologic assessment at admission, confirmed ventilator-assisted pneumonia, median ICU stay, median hospital stay, mortality rates, and ICU and hospital costs were extracted. Data Synthesis: A total of 4,219 studies were retrieved and screened. Eight studies were selected for the systematic review; of these, seven were eligible for the meta-analysis. Comparative analyses were performed between the early tracheostomy and late tracheostomy groups. Mean time for early tracheostomy and late tracheostomy procedures was 5.59 days ( sd , 0.34 d) and 11.8 days ( sd , 0.81 d), respectively. Meta-analysis revealed that early tracheostomy was associated with shorter mechanical ventilation duration (–4.15 [95% CI, –6.30 to –1.99]) as well as ICU (–5.87 d [95% CI, –8.74 to –3.00 d]) and hospital (–6.68 d [95% CI, –8.03 to –5.32 d]) stay durations when compared with late tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy presented less risk difference for ventilator-associated pneumonia (risk difference, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70–0.88). No statistical difference in mortality was found between the groups. Conclusions: The findings from this meta-analysis suggest that early tracheostomy in severe traumatic brain injury patients contributes to a lower exposure to secondary insults and nosocomial adverse events, increasing the opportunity of patient’s early rehabilitation and discharge.
机译:文本中提供了补充数字内容。目的:阐明早期气管造口术对创伤性脑损伤患者住院治疗的影响。数据来源:搜索淡紫色,PubMed和Cochrane数据库。近日日期是2018年8月8日。学习选择:用英语,法语,西班牙语或葡萄牙语,具有创伤性脑损伤的研究作为基础创伤,明确制定的问题,患者的入学评估,住院期间的最低随访,并选择了至少两个在医院内结果。包括回顾性研究,前瞻性分析和案例系列。没有完整报告或抽象,评论,编辑和评论的研究被排除在外。数据提取:研究设计,年,患者人口统计数据,入院和气管造影术之间的平均时间,入学,确认呼吸机辅助肺炎,中位数ICU住宿,中位住院住宿,死亡率和ICU和医院费用。数据合成:检索和筛选共4,219项研究。选择八项研究进行系统审查;其中,七个有资格获得Meta分析。在早期的气管造口术和晚期气管造口术之间进行比较分析。早期气管造口术和晚期气管造口术的平均时间分别为5.59天(SD,0.34℃)和11.8天(SD,0.81d)。荟萃分析表明,早期的气管造口术与机械通气持续时间短(-4.15 [95%CI,-6.30至-1.99])以及ICU(-5.87d [95%CI,-8.74至-3.00d])相关和医院(-6.68d [95%CI,-8.03至-5.32d])与晚期气管造口术相比,保持持续时间。早期的气管造口术呈现出呼吸机相关肺炎的风险差异较小(风险差异,0.78; 95%CI,0.70-0.88)。在组之间发现了死亡率的统计学差异。结论:这种荟萃分析的发现表明,严重创伤性脑损伤患者的早期气管造口术有助于较低的侮辱和医院不良事件暴露,增加患者早期康复和出院的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号