首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >Lack of insurance and parity influence choice between long-acting reversible contraception and sterilization in women postpregnancy
【24h】

Lack of insurance and parity influence choice between long-acting reversible contraception and sterilization in women postpregnancy

机译:缺乏保险和奇偶校验的影响,在妇女后的长效可逆避孕和灭菌之间的选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Disparities in postpregnancy contraception utilization exist, with low-income women disproportionately undergoing sterilization. We assessed the impact of increased intrauterine device (IUD) availability on rates of female sterilization. Study Design: Hospital billing records were used to identify women with an IUD placement or sterilization within 1 year of a pregnancy at a university hospital between Oct 2005 and Jun 2007. Demographic data were compared between women receiving either an IUD or sterilization. Results: There were 365 sterilizations and 223 IUD placements during the study period. IUD placements doubled over the study period from 6% to 12% of all deliveries, while sterilizations remained stable at 11% (p<.001). Demographic variables were examined for women with either public or private insurance who had financial access to both sterilization (n=253) and IUD (n=223). Women receiving sterilization were slightly older (mean age 31 years versus 30 years, p=.03), of higher parity (median three versus two, p<.01), more likely to have had cesarean delivery (69% versus 31%, p<.001) and more likely to have public insurance (77% versus 23%, p<.001) than women who received IUD. Approximately 45% of women delivering in Oregon in 2007 were publicly insured (2010 Maternal and Child Health Update: States Make Progress Towards Improving Systems of Care. National Governor's Association, Table 6. Available at http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/MCHUPDATE2010.PDF, accessed Nov 2011). After adjusting for age, parity and type of delivery, women choosing sterilization were more likely to have public insurance than women choosing IUD (odds ratio 8.4, 95% confidence interval 4.7-14.9, p<.0001). Conclusions: Women choosing sterilization are more likely to have public insurance than women choosing IUD and may represent a continued trend toward nonreversible contraception among women of lower socioeconomic status despite available long-acting reversible methods.
机译:背景:存在遭受避孕利用的差异,具有低收入妇女不成比例地遭受灭菌。我们评估了宫内节育器增加(IUD)可用性对女性灭菌率的影响。学习设计:医院结算记录用于识别2005年10月至2007年10月至2007年6月在大学医院怀孕的1年内患有IUD放置或灭菌的妇女。在接受IUD或灭菌的女性之间比较人口统计数据。结果:研究期间有365名杀菌和223个IUD展示。在研究期间,IUD展示率从所有交付量的6%到12%翻了一番,而灭菌仍保持稳定在11%(P <.001)。对具有公共或私人保险的妇女进行人口变量,他们对灭菌(N = 253)和IUD(n = 223)进行财务访问。接受灭菌的妇女略大(平均31岁与30年,p = .03),更高的平价(中位数三,P <.01),更有可能具有剖腹产(69%对31%, P <.001)更有可能有公共保险(77%对23%,P <.001)比接待IUD的女性。 2007年约有45%的俄勒冈州妇女公开投保(2010年孕产妇和儿童卫生更新:各国对改进护理系统进行进展。国家州长协会,表6.在http://www.nga.org/files提供/live/sites/nga/files/pdf/mchupdate2010.pdf,访问2011年11月)。调整年龄,奇偶校验和交货类型后,选择灭菌的女性更有可能具有比选择IUD的女性的公共保险(赔率比8.4,95%置信区间4.7-14.9,P <.0001)。结论:选择灭菌的女性比选择IUD的女性更有可能拥有公共保险,并且尽管有能力的可逆方法可用,但可能代表社会经济地位较低的妇女之间的不可阅读避孕趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号