...
首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >Pharmacokinetic, biologic and epidemiologic differences in MPA- and NET-based progestin-only injectable contraceptives relative to the potential impact on HIV acquisition in women
【24h】

Pharmacokinetic, biologic and epidemiologic differences in MPA- and NET-based progestin-only injectable contraceptives relative to the potential impact on HIV acquisition in women

机译:基于MPA和Net的孕激素的药代动力学,生物学和流行病学差异相对于妇女艾滋病毒宿主潜在影响的潜在影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Access to safe and effective contraceptive choices is a reproductive right and contributes tremendously to improvements in maternal and child health. Progestin-only injectables, particularly intramuscularly injected depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), have received increased attention given findings suggesting a potential association with increased HIV risk. For women at high risk of HIV, the World Health Organization's Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use currently aggregate recommendations for all progestin-only injectables, including DMPA-IM, subcutaneously injected DMPA (DMPA-SC) and intramuscularly injected norethindrone/norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN), except in the case of some drug interactions. We considered whether published data indicate differences or similarities between these injectables relevant to risk of acquiring HIV. In vitro data confirm different biological activities of these distinct progestins, including that MPA, and not NET, binds and activates the glucocorticoid receptor resulting in different biological effects relevant to immune function. Limited clinical data suggest changes in immunologic activity following DMPA-IM and NET-EN initiation, but interstudy variation and study design differences diminish ability to determine clinical relevance and the degree to which DMPA-IM and NET-EN could act differentially. The highest-quality epidemiologic studies suggest a potential 40% increase in HIV incidence in users of DMPA-IM relative to women not using hormonal contraception but no significant increase in risk in users of NET-EN. In our opinion, most of the available biologic activity and epidemiologic data indicate that DMPA and NET-EN are likely to act differently, and data remain too limited to evaluate differences between DMPA-IM and DMPA-SC. (C) 2019 World Health Organization; licensee Elsevier Inc.
机译:获得安全和有效的避孕选择是一种生殖权利,并促进妇幼保健的巨大贡献。仅孕激素的注射剂,特别是肌肉内注射的脂质蛋白质醋酸酯(DMPA-IM),给予增加的调查结果表明潜在的艾滋病毒风险增加。对于女性感染艾滋病毒的高危人群,世界卫生组织对避孕方法使用医学合格标准目前所有的纯孕激素注射剂,包括DMPA-IM汇总建议,皮下注射DMPA(DMPA-SC)和肌肉注射炔诺酮/庚酸炔诺酮(NET - 除了一些药物相互作用的情况外。我们考虑出版的数据是否表明这些带有艾滋病毒风险的这些注射剂之间的差异或相似之处。体外数据确认这些不同的孕激素的不同生物活性,包括MPa,而不是净结合和激活糖皮质激素受体,导致与免疫功能相关的不同生物学效应。有限的临床数据表明DMPA-IM和NET-EN启动后免疫活性的变化,但非暴力变化和研究设计差异减少了确定临床相关性的能力和DMPA-IM和NET-ZH可以差异的程度。最高质量的流行病学研究表明,DMPA-IM用户在不使用荷尔蒙避孕药的情况下,艾滋病病毒感染者的潜力增加40%,但NET-ZH的用户没有显着增加风险。在我们看来,大多数可用的生物活动和流行病学数据表明DMPA和NET-ZH可能会采取不同的行动,数据仍然过于局限,以评估DMPA-IM和DMPA-SC之间的差异。 (c)2019年世界卫生组织;被许可人elsevier公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号