首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral sciences & the law >Technological advances in the assessment of impulse control in offenders: A systematic review
【24h】

Technological advances in the assessment of impulse control in offenders: A systematic review

机译:在罪犯中评估脉冲控制的技术进步:系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Deficits in impulse control have been linked to criminal offending, risk of recidivism, and other maladaptive behaviours relevant to the criminal justice system (e.g. substance use). Impulse control can be conceptualized as encompassing the broad domains of response inhibition and impulsive/risky decision-making. Advancements in technology have led to the development of computerized behavioural measures to assess performance in these domains, such as go/no-go and delay discounting tasks. Despite a relatively large literature examining these tasks in offenders, findings are not universally consistent. This systematic review aims to synthesize the literature using computerized neurocognitive tasks to assess two domains of impulse control in offenders: response inhibition and impulsive/risky decision-making. The review included 28 studies from diverse geographic locations, settings, and offender populations. The results largely support the general conclusion that offenders exhibit deficits in impulse control compared with non-offenders, with studies of response inhibition more consistently reporting differences than studies using impulsive and risky decision-making tasks. Findings are discussed in the context of contemporary neuroimaging research emphasizing dysfunction in prefrontal cortex as a key contributor to impulse control deficits in offenders.
机译:脉冲控制中的赤字与刑事违规,核查风险以及与刑事司法系统相关的其他不良行为有关,与刑事司法系统(例如,物质使用)有关。脉冲控制可以概念化为包括响应抑制和冲动/危险决策的广泛结构。技术进步导致计算机化行为措施的发展,以评估这些域中的性能,例如Go / No-Go和延迟折扣任务。尽管在违法者中检查了这些任务的相对较大的文献,但结果并不普遍一致。该系统审查旨在使用计算机的神经认知任务综合文献来评估罪犯中的两个脉冲控制领域:响应抑制和冲动/危险的决策。审查包括来自不同地理位置,设置和罪犯群体的28项研究。结果在很大程度上支持了与非罪犯相比,违规者展示了脉冲控制中的缺陷的一般性结论,与使用冲动和冒险决策任务的研究更加持续地报告差异。在当代神经影像研究的背景下讨论了预先逆转Cortex的功能障碍作为罪犯冲动控制赤字的关键贡献者的功能障碍。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Behavioral sciences & the law》 |2019年第4期|共17页
  • 作者单位

    St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton Dept Psychiat &

    Behav Neurosci Peter Boris Ctr Addict Res 100 West 5 St Hamilton ON L8P 3R2 Canada;

    St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton Dept Psychiat &

    Behav Neurosci Peter Boris Ctr Addict Res 100 West 5 St Hamilton ON L8P 3R2 Canada;

    St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton Dept Psychiat &

    Behav Neurosci Peter Boris Ctr Addict Res 100 West 5 St Hamilton ON L8P 3R2 Canada;

    St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton Dept Psychiat &

    Behav Neurosci Peter Boris Ctr Addict Res 100 West 5 St Hamilton ON L8P 3R2 Canada;

    St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton Dept Psychiat &

    Behav Neurosci Peter Boris Ctr Addict Res 100 West 5 St Hamilton ON L8P 3R2 Canada;

    St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton Dept Psychiat &

    Behav Neurosci Peter Boris Ctr Addict Res 100 West 5 St Hamilton ON L8P 3R2 Canada;

    St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton Forens Psychiat Program Hamilton ON Canada;

    St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton Forens Psychiat Program Hamilton ON Canada;

    St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton Forens Psychiat Program Hamilton ON Canada;

    St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton Dept Psychiat &

    Behav Neurosci Peter Boris Ctr Addict Res 100 West 5 St Hamilton ON L8P 3R2 Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号