...
首页> 外文期刊>Conservation genetics >Assessing introgressive hybridization between blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) and black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou) from South Africa
【24h】

Assessing introgressive hybridization between blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) and black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou) from South Africa

机译:评估来自南非蓝牛羚(Connochoetes Taurinus)和黑牛羚(Connochaetes Gnou)之间的渐进杂交

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introgressive hybridization poses a threat to the genetic integrity of black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou) and blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) populations in South Africa. Black wildebeest is endemic to South Africa and was driven to near extinction in the early 1900s due to habitat destruction, hunting pressure and disease outbreaks. Blue wildebeest on the other hand are widely distributed in southern and east Africa. In South Africa the natural distribution ranges of both species overlap, however, extensive translocation of black wildebeest outside of its normal distribution range in South Africa have led to potential hybridization between the two species. The molecular identification of pure and admixed populations is necessary to design viable and sustainable conservation strategies, since phenotypic evidence of hybridization is inconclusive after successive generations of backcrossing. The aim of this study was to assess levels of hybridization in wildebeest using both species-specific and cross-species microsatellite markers. Black wildebeest (157) and blue wildebeest (122) from provincial and national parks and private localities were included as reference material, with 180 putative hybrid animals also screened. A molecular marker panel consisting of 13 cross-species and 11 species-specific microsatellite markers was developed. We used a Bayesian clustering model to confirm the uniqueness of blue- and black wildebeest reference groups, assign individuals to each of the two clusters, and determine levels of admixture. Results indicated a clear partition between black wildebeest and blue wildebeest (the average proportions of membership to black wildebeest and blue wildebeest clusters were QI = 0.994 and QI = 0.955 respectively). From the putative hybrid samples, only five hybrid individuals were confirmed. However, high levels of linkage disequilibrium were observed in the putative hybrid populations which may indicate historical hybridization. Measu
机译:陷入僵局的杂交对南非的黑牛羚(Connochoges Gnou)和蓝牛(Connochogaetes Taurinus)群体的遗传完整性构成了威胁。 Black Wildebeest对南非的地方是流行的,由于栖息地破坏,狩猎压力和疾病爆发,在20世纪初而被驱使到濒临灭绝。另一方面,蓝色牛羚广泛分布在南部和东非。在南非的自然分布范围,然而,南非正常分配范围内的黑牛羚的自然分配范围导致了两种物种之间的潜在杂交。纯和混合群体的分子鉴定是设计可行和可持续的保护策略所必需的,因为杂交的表型证据在连续几代回复后不确定。本研究的目的是利用特异性和跨物种微卫星标记评估牛羚杂交水平。 Black Wildebeest(157)和蓝牛(122)包括省和国家公园和私人地区的参考资料,还有180名推定的混合动物。开发了由13种交叉物质和11种特异性微卫星标记组成的分子标记面板。我们使用了贝叶斯聚类模型来确认蓝色和黑色牛羚参考组的独特性,将个人分配给两个群集中的每一个,并确定混合物的水平。结果表明,黑牛羚和蓝牛羚之间的清晰分区(Blue Wildebeest(Black Wildebeest和Blue Wildebest集群的平均比例)分别为QI = 0.994和Qi = 0.955)。从推定的杂交样品中,只证实了五个杂交个体。然而,在推定的杂交种群中观察到高水平的连杆不平衡,其可能表明历史杂交。测量

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号