...
首页> 外文期刊>CNS spectrums >Neurodevelopmental Disorders (ASD and ADHD): DSM-5, ICD-10, and ICD-11
【24h】

Neurodevelopmental Disorders (ASD and ADHD): DSM-5, ICD-10, and ICD-11

机译:神经发育障碍(ASD和ADHD):DSM-5,ICD-10和ICD-11

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Neurodevelopmental disorders, specifically autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have undergone considerable diagnostic evolution in the past decade. In the United States, the current system in place is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), whereas worldwide, the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) serves as a general medical system. This review will examine the differences in neurodevelopmental disorders between these two systems. First, we will review the important revisions made from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) to the DSM-5, with respect to ASD and ADHD. Next, we will cover the similarities and differences between ASD and ADHD classification in the DSM-5 and the ICD-10, and how these differences may have an effect on neurodevelopmental disorder diagnostics and classification. By examining the changes made for the DSM-5 in 2013, and critiquing the current ICD-10 system, we can help to anticipate and advise on the upcoming ICD-11, due to come online in 2017. Overall, this review serves to highlight the importance of progress towards complementary diagnostic classification systems, keeping in mind the difference in tradition and purpose of the DSM and the ICD, and that these systems are dynamic and changing as more is learned about neurodevelopmental disorders and their underlying etiology. Finally this review will discuss alternative diagnostic approaches, such as the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative, which links symptom domains to underlying biological and neurological mechanisms. The incorporation of new diagnostic directions could have a great effect on treatment development and insurance coverage for neurodevelopmental disorders worldwide.
机译:神经发育障碍,特别是自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)在过去十年中经历了相当大的诊断演变。在美国,目前的系统到位是精神障碍的诊断和统计手册,第五版(DSM-5),而在全球范围内,疾病的国际统计分类和相关的健康问题,第十修订(ICD-10)服务作为一般医疗系统。该审查将检查这两个系统之间的神经发育障碍的差异。首先,我们将审查从精神障碍,第四版,文本修订(DSM-IV-TR)的诊断和统计手册以及DSM-5以及ASD和ADHD的诊断和统计手册所作的重要修订。接下来,我们将涵盖DSM-5和ICD-10中ASD和ADHD分类之间的相似性和差异,以及这些差异如何对神经发育障碍诊断和分类产生影响。通过审查2013年为DSM-5所做的变化,并批评目前的ICD-10系统,我们可以帮助预测和建议即将到来的ICD-11,由于2017年在线上网。总体而言,这次审查有助于突出对互补诊断分类系统的进展的重要性,牢记DSM和ICD的传统和目的的差异,以及这些系统的动态和变化,因为更多是关于神经发育障碍及其潜在的病因。最后,这篇评论将讨论替代诊断方法,例如研究域标准(RDOC)倡议,将症状结构域与基础生物和神经机制联系起来。新的诊断方向纳入全球神经发育障碍的治疗发育和保险覆盖率很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号