...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis >Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis With a Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Alteplase for Subacute Proximal Venous Thrombosis: Efficacy and Safety Compared to Urokinase
【24h】

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis With a Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Alteplase for Subacute Proximal Venous Thrombosis: Efficacy and Safety Compared to Urokinase

机译:导管导向的溶栓,连续输注低剂量的血液血栓血栓形成:与尿激酶相比的疗效和安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety associated with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using either recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or urokinase (UK) for subacute deep venous thrombosis (DVT). From January 2014 to December 2016, we conducted a retrospective analysis on a total of 49 patients who underwent consistent CDT with either rt-PA (rt-PA-CDT group) or UK (UK-CDT group) treatment. The thrombolytic rate of the rt-PA-CDT group was significantly higher than that of the UK-CDT group (87.5% vs 60%, respectively; (2) = 4.751; P = .029). The rt-PA-CDT group exhibited an improved grade III thrombolytic rate (9 patients vs 3 patients; (2) = 5.144; P = .023). The time for the rt-PA-CDT group to achieve a grade III thrombolytic rate was shorter than that of the UK-CDT group (5.01 +/- 1.09 days vs 6.43 +/- 1.69 days, respectively; t = -2.187; P = .044). No severe complications were seen in either group and mild complications rates were 16.7% and 20.0% ((2) = .091; P = .763). The clinical efficacy rates at discharge were 91.7% and 76.0%, respectively ((2) = 2.200; P = .138). In conclusion, CDT with a continuous infusion of low-dose rt-PA resulted in safe and effective thrombolysis in the great majority of patients with proximal DVT in the subacute phase. Furthermore, rt-PA was significantly better than UK in terms of the thrombolytic rate. In our study, rt-PA-CDT improved the thrombolytic rate of grade III thrombus and achieved a grade III thrombolytic rate in a shorter time than UK-CDT.
机译:本研究的目的是使用用于亚急性深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的重组组织纤溶酶原激活剂(RT-PA)或尿激酶(UK)来比较与导管血栓栓塞(CDT)相关的疗效和安全性。从2014年1月到2016年12月,我们对49名患者进行了回顾性分析,该患者接受了一致的CDT,RT-PA(RT-PA-CDT组)或英国(UK-CDT组)治疗。 RT-PA-CDT组的溶栓率明显高于英国-CDT组(分别为87.5%,分别为60%;(2)= 4.751; p = .029)。 RT-PA-CDT组提高了III级血栓溶液率(9例VS 3患者;(2)= 5.144; p = .023)。 RT-PA-CDT组达到III级溶栓率的时间短于英国CDT组(5.01 +/- 1.09天,分别为6.43 +/- 1.69天; T = -2.187; p = .044)。在任一组中没有看到严重的并发症,并发症率为16.7%和20.0%((2)= .091; p = .763)。排出时的临床疗效率分别为91.7%和76.0%((2)= 2.200; p = .138)。总之,CDT具有低剂量RT-PA的连续输注导致亚静脉期近端DVT的大多数患者中的安全有效溶栓。此外,就溶栓速率而言,RT-PA显着优于英国。在我们的研究中,RT-PA-CDT改善了III级血栓的溶栓率,并且在比英国CDT的时间较短的时间内实现了III级血栓率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号