首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Does the Alpha-defensin Immunoassay or the Lateral Flow Test Have Better Diagnostic Value for Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Systematic Review
【24h】

Does the Alpha-defensin Immunoassay or the Lateral Flow Test Have Better Diagnostic Value for Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Systematic Review

机译:α-Defensin免疫测定或横向流动测试是否具有更好的诊断价值的百血性关节感染? 系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundMeasuring alpha-defensin concentrations in synovial fluid may help to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). There are two commercially available methods for measuring alpha-defensin in synovial fluid: the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based Synovasure (R) alpha-defensin immunoassay, which gives a numeric readout within 24 hours, and the Synovasure lateral flow test, which gives a binary readout within 20 minutes. There is no compilation of the existing literature to support the use of one of these two tests over the other.Questions/purposesDoes the immunoassay or the lateral flow test have better diagnostic value (sensitivity and specificity) in diagnosing PJI?MethodsWe followed PRISMA guidelines and identified all studies on alpha-defensin concentration in synovial fluid as a PJI diagnostic marker, indexed to April 14, 2017, in PubMed, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and OVID databases. The search retrieved 1578 records. All prospective and retrospective studies on alpha-defensin as a PJI marker (PJI classified according to the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society) after THA or TKA were included in the analysis. All studies used only one of the two commercially available test methods, but none of them was comparative. After excluding studies with overlapping patient populations, four studies investigating the alpha-defensin immunoassay and three investigating the lateral flow test remained. Alpha-defensin immunoassay studies included 482 joints and lateral flow test studies included 119. The quality of the trials was assessed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. The heterogeneity among studies was evaluated by the I-2 index, indicating that the heterogeneity of the included studies was low. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and receiver operating curves were calculated for each method and compared with each other.ResultsThe alpha-defensin immunoassay had superior overall diagnostic value compared with the lateral flow test (area under the curve, 0.98 versus 0.75) with higher sensitivity (96% [90%-98%] versus 71% [55%-83%], p 0.001), but no difference in specificity with the numbers available (96% [93%-97%] versus 90% [81%-95%], p = 0.060).ConclusionsMeasurement of alpha-defensin in synovial fluid is a valuable complement to existing diagnostic criteria, and the immunoassay test detects PJI more accurately than the lateral flow test. The lateral flow test has lower sensitivity, making it difficult to rule out infection, but its relatively high specificity combined with the advantage of a quick response time can make it useful to rule in infection perioperatively.Level of EvidenceLevel III, diagnostic study.
机译:滑膜液中的α-Defensin浓度可能有助于诊断跨骨髓关节感染(PJI)。在滑液中有两种商业上可获得的方法,用于在滑液中测量α-防御素:酶联免疫吸附测定的Synovaure(R)α-防御素免疫测定,其在24小时内给出数字读数,并给予20分钟内的二进制读数。现有文献没有汇编来支持使用这两个测试中的一个.Questions / purpsedoes,免疫测定或横向流动测试具有更好的诊断价值(敏感性和特异性)在诊断PJI时进行诊断价值(敏感性和特异性)?方法上遵循PRISMA指南和鉴定了在滑膜中的α-Defensin浓度的所有研究,作为PJI诊断标记,索引到2017年4月14日,在PubMed,JSTOR,Google Scholar和Ovid数据库中。搜索检索了1578条记录。在分析中,α-防御素作为PJI标记的α-防御素的所有前瞻性和回顾性研究(PJI归类于肌肉骨骼感染学会的标准)。所有研究只使用了两种商业上可获得的测试方法中的一种,但它们都没有比较。除了重叠患者群体的研究之后,还研究了四项研究α-防御素免疫测定和三种研究留下的侧向流动试验。 α-Defensin免疫测定研究包括482个关节和横向流动测试研究119.根据诊断准确性研究(Quadas-2)工具的质量评估评估试验的质量。通过I-2指数评估研究中的异质性,表明所附研究的异质性低。为每种方法计算汇集敏感性,特异性,正和负似然比和接收器操作曲线,与彼此相比进行比较。与横向流动试验(曲线下的面积为0.98与曲线区域,0.98与曲线下的面积相比,α-防御素免疫测定具有优异的整体诊断价值。 0.75)敏感性较高(96%[90%-98%]对71%[55%-83%],P <0.001),但没有可用数量的特异性差异(96%[93%-97%] [90%[81%-95%],p = 0.060)。滑膜流体中α-防御素的合并是对现有诊断标准的有价值的补充,并且免疫测定试验比横向流动测试更精确地检测PJI。横向流动测试具有较低的灵敏度,使得难以排除感染,但其相对较高的特异性与快速响应时间的优势结合可以使其有助于统治围手术期。eVidencelevel III的诊断研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号